Dual Enrollment/Dual Credit
Programs: A Survey of Current Practices and the Need for Dual Enrollment/Dual
Credit Programs within Adventist Education
Shelley Bacon
Masters in Leadership Thesis
Professor: Shirley Freed
May 2, 2004
Abstract
Research Problem: Public higher education
and high school programs are collaborating to provide dual enrollment/dual
credit programs for qualifying seniors and/or juniors and seniors. These
programs are widely available and almost always free. Adventist faith-based
education has no comparable program to fill this need. Adventist LEAP – Leading
Edge Accelerated Program – needs to be established to meet the academic needs
of accelerated Adventist high school students from a distinctly Adventist
faith-based perspective.
Research Question: The
central research question is to ascertain the need for implementing an
Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit program such as is currently being
proposed by Walla Walla College and myself. More specifically, this project
asks the questions, “What faith-based, distinctively Adventist dual
enrollment/dual credit programs are available to Adventist students on our
academy and college campuses?” “What are the perceptions of need for such
programs within Adventist education?”
Data Collection
Procedure: Mixed methods were used in collecting data. Questionnaires were sent
to 12 Adventist institutions of higher learning in order to ascertain the
availability of dual enrollment/dual credit programs as well as distance
learning courses. Academic vice presidents or someone of their choosing was
asked to fill out these forms. Questionnaires were sent to 93 Adventist
academies in the North American Division of Seventh-day Adventist Churches for
the purpose of discovering what options were available at the high school level
for advanced placement and/or dual enrollment/dual credit programs.
Questionnaires were sent to 93 churches in the North Pacific Union Conference
for the purpose of determining where our Adventist young people were attending
school. All responses were compiled and quantitatively analyzed to represent
the results of the questionnaires. Additionally, two focus groups were held to
solicit opinions from parents of advanced high school students about dual
enrollment/dual credit programs. These focus group comments were qualitatively
analyzed.
Findings:
There is widespread implementation of dual enrollment/dual credit programs in
the public school sector. Every state has a program. In the Adventist school
system, dual enrollment/dual credit programs are not widely available. More
readily available is a similar but different program called “AP,” standing for
“Advanced Placement” program. Adventist colleges are not currently offering
many dual enrollment/dual credit courses, and no dual enrollment/dual credit courses
are offered through distance learning.
Church clerks in the North Pacific Union Conference indicated that few
Adventist students were attending dual enrollment/dual credit programs in their
local area. I expected to find a higher percentage of students being reported
by the local church clerks as attending community college programs in a dual
enrollment/dual credit program, but I did not. My prior experience in my own
small town with a significant number of Adventist youth attending the local
community college’s dual enrollment/dual credit program (“Running Start”) for
their junior and senior year of high school led me to believe that implementing
such a program for Adventist education was important. This idea became
crystallized in the winter of 2002 when one of my students wanted to attend a
dual enrollment/dual credit program in their state of Florida and the mother
called me for advice. While the church clerk questionnaires do not indicate a
high percentage of Adventist youth who are enrolled in public dual
enrollment/dual credit programs, I believe the number would be higher if I were
able to find or develop the right research tool to more accurately ascertain
these figures. A low percentage of church clerks (30%) returned the surveys,
further questioning their accuracy in drawing conclusions about dual
enrollment/dual credit enrollment by Adventist children. The focus groups did
allow for significant questioning of the philosophy behind instituting an
Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit program, but especially the second
research group affirmed what I had believed: There is a perceived need among
parents of advanced students for an Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit
program. I recommend that Adventist education continue to work to implement such
programs in our Adventist system.
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs
are called by many names throughout our nation. They all have at least one
thing in common: Dual enrollment/dual credit programs allow high school
students to enroll in college level classes while still in high school. These
programs vary from state to state, but primarily are a cooperation of local
community colleges (and sometimes four-year colleges) and high schools. Most
states allow credit to be given for both high school and college when taking a
college level class (either an AP [Advanced Placement] class or an actual
college class). Additionally most states pay for part if not all of a student’s
dual enrollment courses at the community college level. While some disagreement
exists, the overall research to date indicates that these dual enrollment/dual
credit programs (sometimes called “College Early” or “Postsecondary Educational
Options”) enhance a student’s performance in college. Some dual enrollment/dual
credit programs utilize distance education as one means of delivering dual
enrollment/dual credit courses. Adventist education has no formal program that
parallels this primarily public program. This research will give an overview of
current dual enrollment/dual credit programs in the public sector, detail the
presence of any dual enrollment/dual credit options at Adventist academies and
colleges, and demonstrate a felt need for faith-based, Adventist dual
enrollment/dual credit programs.
This thesis paper will
outline the following:
The birthplace of dual
enrollment is difficult to pinpoint. Syracuse University, a private university
in New York was the leader and perhaps the inspiration for all dual enrollment
programs. “Syracuse University Project Advance (SUPA) began in 1972 when seven
local high schools approached Syracuse University to devise a program to offer
college courses to qualified high school seniors” (Syracuse University Project Advance).
The Syracuse model focuses on teaching college level classes at the high school
level. The first state to implement a
dual enrollment program was Minnesota. “In 1985 the State of Minnesota passed a
bill creating the Post Secondary Enrollment Options Program (PSEO) which allows
high school juniors and seniors to take courses full-or part-time at a
post-secondary institution for high school credit” (Southwest Minnesota State
University ). New York instituted a program called “College Now,”
but it is not based on the same model as most dual enrollment/dual credit
programs and is not identified as the first such program. "College
Now" in New York City was created by agreement between the City University
of New York [CUNY] and the New York City Public School System in 1984” (Hoffman, N.).
Washington
State began their “Running Start” program in 1990 with a two-year pilot program
involving a limited number of high schools and community colleges. In the
1992-93 school year, 3,350 students enrolled in the program as it expanded
statewide (http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/data/rsrchrpts/runstart_a03.pdf,
p. 2). These programs appear to be the oldest dual enrollment/dual
credit programs in the nation.
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs
were created for a variety of reasons. Catron (1998) mentions the following
rationales for implementing such programs: “increasing college tuition costs,
public skepticism about the value of increased secondary school spending,
debate over the purpose of college and the meaning of cultural literacy.” A
2001 document compiled by the Education Committee of the States Center for
Community College Policy (http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/28/11/2811.doc)
lists additional reasons for encouraging and implementing dual enrollment/dual
credit programs:
■
To
promote rigorous academics and to provide more educational options
■
To
save students time and money on a college degree
■
To
encourage competition from colleges and universities which then might pressure
secondary schools to be more responsive to student and parent needs
■
To
accelerate student progress towards a degree in order to free up additional
space on campus to meet the increased demands for college access by the
children of the “baby boom” generation
■
To
provide greater academic opportunities for students at small rural schools
■
To
enable greater collaboration between high school and college faculty
■
To
increase student aspirations to go to college
■
To
build closer ties between colleges and their communities.
Overview of Dual Enrollment Programs
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs have grown steadily since the idea
of offering college-level courses to high schools was first implemented.
Washington’s Running Start program’s enrollment has increased by about three
percent per year (Hoffman, 2003, p. 6), with a 5% increase in the 2002-2003
school year over the previous year’s enrollment (Koenninger et al, 2002-2003);
it “currently serves about 10% of the states high school juniors and seniors,”
bringing the total enrollment to 14,682 for the 2002-2003 school year (Koenninger
et al, 2002-2003, p. 2). Dual enrollment classes were filled with
11,000 students in Arizona, according to Hoffman (2003, p. 6). New York’s
“College Now” program “now includes
a pilot for ninth graders and expects to serve 45,000 students in 2002-2003,”
and Florida’s “Dual Enrollment” program “experienced an 82 percent cumulative
increase between 1992 and 2001” (Hoffman, 2003, p. 6). Minnesota reports that
“in 1999-2000…about 20 percent or 12,000 Minnesota high
school seniors took advantage of the Postsecondary Enrollment Options Program”
(Hoffman, 2003, p. 6).
The most recent information
available indicates that all 50 of the United States currently have
functioning, public dual enrollment programs. The definitions, policies, and
procedures for these programs vary from state to state, but the most common
characteristic of all programs is that they give credit for both high school
and college when a qualifying junior or senior takes a college-level class. In
fact, 49 out of 50 states give both secondary and post secondary credit for classes taken in a dual
enrollment situation (Hale, 2002). Appendix B gives an excellent
summary of all state programs, and includes information about finances, credit,
incentives, etc.
Suffice it to say, the popularity of
dual enrollment programs is increasing. Interestingly, Edwards (2001) says
there” is a push throughout the country to assure that some dual-credit courses
— including Advanced Placement courses — are offered in every high school. This
push has made dual-enrollment classes the fastest growing segment of the high
school curriculum” (p. 6).
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs
are offered not only at public institutions, but at private institutions as
well. Private colleges are creating structures to allow students to take
college credits while in high school and receive both secondary and
postsecondary credit. San Joaquin Delta College in Stockton, CA, has a “College
Early Start Program.” This program gives college credit only, but lets each
school district determine whether they will grant secondary credit for the
college courses completed in this program (College Early Start Program,
College Credit Opportunities).
The Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities is “one
of only two residential programs for gifted and talented high school students
recognized by the Texas State Legislature. Academy students fulfill their
junior and senior high school requirements by taking university classes and
thereby earn college credit as well” (Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities).
Guilford College in Greensboro, NC, is working with the local high school to
institute a dual enrollment/dual credit program. Schuh (2001) says “Guilford
County high school teachers would teach ninth and tenth graders in Guilford’s
classroom space, while the eleventh and twelfth graders would take regular
college classes and have dual enrollment status. Upon graduating from high
school, the students would also have completed their first two years of
college.” Concordia University in St. Paul, Minnesota, allows juniors and
seniors to enroll in 100 and 200 level courses in cooperation with the
Minnesota Post-Secondary Enrollment Act (Post-secondary Enrollment
Options). The
colleges and universities mentioned are only a sampling of the institutions of
higher education that either have or are developing a dual enrollment/dual
credit program.
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs
are also increasingly turning to distance education as one means of offering
courses and conferring credit. Northwest College offers post-secondary
enrollment options for high school juniors and seniors who wish to enroll in
“non-sectarian” college courses through distance learning (Center for Distance Education,
Northwestern Colleges). Additionally, both North Dakota and Colorado use
distance learning as a component of their dual enrollment programs (Hale, 2002).
Washington’s Running Start students are also accessing more online education
for their dual credits. Koenninger et al. (2002-2003) report the following:
Following
a national trend in higher education, Running Start students are utilizing more
online instruction. In the last five years, the online FTE has grown by 440
percent. Most of the online courses are in social science, English composition
and humanities. Washington’s community and technical colleges offer two-year
degrees online. Making the virtual campus available to Running Start students
makes the program more accessible to students in remote areas and allows
students to access college courses from their high school campus. (Some high
schools have designated one free period a day so students can get into the
computer labs to participate in a variety of online learning experiences.)
The
statistics included in this study tell us that 64 FTE students utilized
distance learning in 1998-99, as opposed to 343 FTE students just four years
later during the 2002-2003 school year. The headcount for distance learning in
the same time frame is 427 and 2008, respectively. Illinois reports that 16 of
the 48 public community colleges offer dual credit courses using distance
learning (2-way interactive), and 12 colleges utilize the Internet to offer
dual credit courses (Andrews, 2000). While face-to-face instruction (primarily
on the community college or college/university campus) is still the primary
source of instruction, distance learning is an option for at least some dual
enrollment/dual credit programs.
Whether dual enrollment programs
utilize face-to-face instruction or distance learning, funding of these
programs varies from state to state (see Chart 1 in appendix). Some states have
what is termed “comprehensive” dual enrollment programs where students pay
little or no enrollment fees, where credit is given at both secondary and
college levels, and/or where few course restrictions apply. These states
include California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Maine,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, New Mexico, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Utah. “Limited”
program states have dual enrollment programs where students pay tuition, or
where there are more academic and course restrictions. These states include
Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maryland, Montana, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New
York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Wyoming (Hale, 2002). Ohio Valley
College dual enrollment credits cost $39.00/credit hour, which is a special
tuition rate for the dual enrollment program only (Early College Entrance Program, Ohio Valley College). Western Piedmont College in North
Carolina offers dual enrollment (“concurrent” enrollment) courses for free.
Students have to pay $5-10 for courses and purchase their books (Western Piedmont Community
College Concurrent Enrollment). At Concordia University in Minnesota,
high school juniors and seniors can take courses on a space-available basis for
no charge. They don’t even have to purchase their own books (Post-secondary Enrollment Options).
The method of conferring credits for
dual enrollment/dual credit programs is individually decided by the states just
as tuition policies vary from state to state. According to Apendix B, most
states confer credit for both high school and college for dual enrollment
courses. Some states list options of “Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit.” Hawaii’s Running Start (RS)
program, modeled to a large degree after Washington State’s similarly named
program, worked through the credit issue based on how Washington solved the
problem:
This
dual designation process was, initially, problematic in Washington as well
(there are no high school direct equivalents of many college courses).
Washington resolved this problem by listing RS college courses on high school
transcripts by using a prefix of RS, followed by the high school core area
alpha, followed by the college alpha and course number. For example a Sociology
100 (Intro to Sociology course) would be listed as a Social Studies unit on a
high school transcript as: RS SS SOC 100 (Cleveland, 2002, p. 16).
Success of Current Dual Enrollment/Dual
Credit Programs
Dual enrollment/dual credit programs
are widespread and popular. But are they effective? Is this concept just another
educational trend that will end up littering the halls of academia as one more
failed attempt at educating our youth? Bailey and Karp (2003) undertook a
significant study to determine the effectiveness of transitional programs,
including dual enrollment programs. They reviewed all literature from 1990 to
2003, interviewed state and college level personnel, and did their own
fieldwork at 15 community colleges in seven states between 2000 and 2002. What
is very interesting about this study is its inclusion of preparing not only the
above average or bright student for transition to college, but enabling a
smooth and successful transition for the slower and more challenged student as
well. Bailey and Karp (2003) argue that dual enrollment programs will benefit
these students in several specific ways:
§
Prepare
students for the academic rigors of college
§
Provide
more realistic information to students about the skills they need to succeed in
college
§
Help
high school faculty prepare their students for the college experience
§
Expose
traditionally non-college-bound students to college
§
Provide
curricular options to students
§
Improve
motivation through high expectations
§
Lower
the cost of postsecondary education for students (pp 4-6).
Bailey
and Karp conclude the first part of their study by stating that “credit-based
transition programs are believed to lead to many positive outcomes for
students…and some educators argue that even exposing lower achieving students
to college early can improve their access to college and their success once
they are there” (pp. 6-7). These researchers go on to discuss and quote a
number of studies about various transitional programs (AP, IB, Tech prep, dual
enrollment). For instance, one study done in Arizona tried to account for prior
academic achievement. This study compared students who had participated in
“either AP or dual enrollment (or both) to those who did not participate in any
credit-based transition program…” (Bailey and Karp, 2003) and found that the
students who had participated in some sort of dual enrollment program had
smaller drops in their grade point averages during their freshman year as
compared to other students (p. 24). While several other studies were quoted, Is
concluded that data about the success of transitional programs of all kinds was
not sufficient to draw any definitive conclusions as to the success and/or
effectiveness of these programs, particularly because most studies (with the
exception of the Arizona study mentioned above) did not allow for exceptions
based on prior academic achievement.
Western Washington University did a study
quoted in the Running Start 2000-01 Annual Progress Report that showed “study
participants reported feeling well prepared academically for Western” (p. 3).
Additionally, “All students said that their exposure to…courses at the
community college had helped them choose their major field of study at Western”
(p. 4). An additional study coming out of Washington’s Running Start program is
quoted in A Smart Investment, an online newsletter from Washington
Community and Technical Colleges. In this study, 920 Running Start students
were studied in the fall of 2001. In a review of the Running Start students’
performance, it was found that these students averaged almost exactly the same
GPA as the same as all other students who entered the University of Washington
as freshmen. However, this study also concluded that Running
Start students earned higher GPAs and were more likely to graduate in four
years than students who began their college education at the UW (Running Start,
2003). An additional statistic from Washington’s Running Start program tells us
that the 2002-03 Running Start students “earned an average grade point of
3.16 after transferring to the University of Washington” (Koenninger et al,
2002-03, p. 2). Hawaii’s Running Start program’s
second year evaluation summarized the success of the program in the following
manner:
An analysis of the actual grades (not
self reported, but gathered from HCC student records) of RS student performance
for the Spring and Summer Semesters of 2002 demonstrate that RS students are
succeeding in their college coursework.
Running Start students completed (with grades)
83% of the classes in which they enrolled (a higher percentage of class
completions than experienced by traditional first semester HCC liberal arts
students).
Only one RS student received a failing
(“F”) grade. Overall (including the
“F”), the grade point average for Spring 2002 RS students was 3.06 (“W” and “N”
Grades not included in calculation.) (Cleveland and Maslowski, 2002).
It should be noted that the mean GPA for
students entering the Hawaii Running Start program was 2.9, with a low of 2.0
and a high of 3.7 (Davidson, 2002, p. 9). Hawaii’s RS program’s second year
evaluation reveals several additional significant facts. First, most high
school students plan to either increase their participation in high school
activities (26%) or maintain their current level of high school activity
participation (72%), allaying the fears of some that participation in these
programs interferes significantly with the ability of high school students to
be actively engaged in their high school experience. Second, most participants
in Hawaii’s RS program are first generation college students. The study reports
that “53% of RS fathers and 59% of RS mothers did not attend college”
(Cleveland and Maslowski, 2002). This is especially important in light of the
third interesting fact: “An increasing percentage of RS students report that
they plan to earn advanced degrees.
Last summer about three-quarters of respondents reported that they would
pursue advanced degrees. This year 84%
of the respondents are seeking Master’s, Doctorate, or Professional Degrees”
(Cleveland and Maslowski, 2002, chart/table #4).
An additional benefit of dual
enrollment/dual credit programs that contribute to their success and to the
success of the students who utilize them is the alleviation of a syndrome known
as “senioritis,” or “senior slump.” Peterson’s (2003) article “Overcoming the
Senior Slump: The Community College Role,” summarizes a study by Kirst (2001)
in this manner: “[Kirst] indicates that students who waste their senior year,
even if they engaged in challenging courses during their preceding years of
high school, are often unprepared for college-level work and are more likely to
drop-out.” Peterson (2003) draws the conclusion that “senior slump” creates
problems that community college programs (such as dual enrollment options) can
address. Apparently, this “senior slump” problem was significant enough to call
for the formation of a special commission to study the issues surrounding the
phenomenon. The National Commission on the High School Senior Year (2001) gave
a number of recommendations for curing the syndrome of “senioritis.” Along with
suggestions for the senior year moving away from “more of the same” to a year
filled with projects, internships, and research projects, the commission
suggested seniors “take college level courses” (p. 22). A further
recommendation stated that collaboration should occur between high schools and
university administrators, and that they should pay “particular attention to
the linkages between the last two years of high school and collegiate
curricula” (p. 25). The commission mentioned dual enrollment in specific as one
means of accomplishing an additional recommendation that “state and local
educators…reshape the senior year to provide more learning opportunities of all
kinds” (p. 32). “We believe that…dual enrollment options…should be encouraged,”
the Commission stated (p. 32). The National Commission on the High School
Senior Year strongly believes that the academic rigor of the senior year in
high school should be strengthened, and that dual enrollment programs could be
a significant way to accomplish that goal.
Summary of Current Dual Enrollment/Dual
Credit Programs
Recent literature tells us that dual enrollment/dual credit
programs – called by many different names – are ubiquitous. They have existed
in some form in this country for thirty years. Arguably, they are successful in
meeting their stated goals. Students certainly do no poorer in dual enrollment
courses than they do in their high school courses, and participation in college
level courses during high school tends to prepare students for success when
they are enrolled full time at a college of their choice. Most dual
enrollment/dual credit programs are offered through public education, but some
private colleges are entering this area as well. What is Adventist education
doing to meet the needs of its advanced students? Do we have any faith-based
initiative to compete with the ubiquitous and often free dual enrollment
courses offered elsewhere?
Current Practices of Dual
Enrollment/Dual Credit in Adventist Education
In order to answer the research question, “What faith-based,
distinctively Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit programs are available to
Adventist students on our academy and college campuses?” surveys were sent to all 12-grade Adventist academies and to all
colleges in the North American Division of Seventh-day Adventist. The data
collected was analyzed quantitatively and is represented in the narrative and
figures below.
A survey was sent to the academic vice
presidents of Adventist colleges and universities in the United States with the
intention of discovering what dual enrollment/dual credit programs (including
Advanced Placement or AP programs) were currently being offered through
Adventist higher educational institutions (see Appendix E). Of the 12 surveys
sent, nine were completed and returned.
The
first survey question asked if the institution currently offered any advanced
placement classes for high school students. (AP classes are typically taught at
high schools by high school teachers, but Adventist colleges/universities
approve qualified academy teachers as instructors for AP courses.) Of the nine
institutions responding, six answered “yes.” Those who responded with a “yes”
to the first question answered a follow-up question about the requirements for
such classes. Five of the six institutions that offer AP classes have a minimum
GPA requirement. Four of those five require a minimum GPA of 3.0; the fifth
requires a minimum GPA of 3.5. None of the six institutions that offer AP
classes had a minimum age requirement, but four allow both junior and senior
students to take AP classes, and two allow only seniors to enroll. Two of the
six also require either permission of the principal, or recommendation of the
principal or guidance counselor. (Figure 1.)
Colleges/Universities
Offering AP
Figure 1
Of
the six colleges/universities that offer AP courses, two only offer classes
taught by on-site faculty (high school students must be on the
college/university campus to participate). Three of the six offer classes on site
in addition to classes by qualified academy teachers on the academy campus. One
of these three contracts with qualified teachers on academy campuses to teach
AP classes. One college/university only offers AP classes taught by qualified
academy teachers on the academy campus. (Figure 2.)
Colleges/Universities
Offering AP
Figure
2

The
colleges/universities were asked to list the courses available to high school
students utilizing the AP system. Because most AP courses are taught at the
high school level, colleges/universities may not consider that they officially
“offer” these courses, but simply transcript the credits for such courses. Two
colleges/universities attached documents from their bulletins listing a
significant number of AP classes for which their institution would grant credit
upon receiving a passing score from the student taking the AP test. The
college/university then simply transcripts the grades. Because of the lack of
definition of “AP” classes on the research questionnaire, it appears that the
respondents included all courses available to high school juniors and/or
seniors. The individual AP and/or college courses the six colleges/universities
offer are listed below (individual bullets indicate one specific institution’s
responses):
§
General
Psychology; any lower division college class on the college campus
§
Pre-calculus;
college writing
§
Freshmen
level courses with the exception of P.E. activity courses and music courses
(individualized)
§
All
freshman and sophomore classes
§
English
(college writing); geology
§
Any
100-level general ed class; occasional 200-level classes; advanced math classes
after meeting prerequisites
Colleges/universities were asked to
explain their process of accepting credit for AP classes from academies. Here
are the responses from the six respondents who either contract with qualified
academy instructors to teach AP courses, or who offer college courses to
students on the college campus:
§
If
they are official “AP” classes we will accept them. Otherwise, only college
credits
§
Accepting
AP credits used to attract seniors to our college
§
Students
must enroll as (specific institution name) student in order for credit to count
§
University
grants credit for AP courses with a score of 3, 4, or 5; transcript will
indicate that credits accepted have been completed by examination…AP credit
will be recorded only after 12 hours of current (specific institution name)
course work.
§
They
send us the info; we transcript it.
§
College
credit is granted to students w/ AP scores of 3 or higher, except English. To
receive English credit, students must score a 5.
Respondents
were asked how reimbursement for classes were handled if visiting college
professors taught some advanced placement classes at some academies. Only one
respondent felt this question applied to their college/university’s situation,
and answered that teachers were paid “on a contract teacher basis, according to
our policy.”
Three of the nine
college/university respondents replied “no” to the initial question of whether
they offered AP classes to high school students. Two of these respondents also
answered “no” to the question, “Have you considered offering advanced placement
classes for academy junior or junior and senior students?” One respondent said
they had considered offering advanced placement classes, and had also offered
these classes in the past (at Auburn Academy in Tacoma, WA). Two of these two
institutions was aware of dual enrollment/dual credit programs in their state;
the other respondent did not answer that question. One of these two
colleges/universities did accept credits from public dual enrollment/dual
credit programs, and the other did not.
Of the six
colleges/universities that did offer AP or other courses to academy junior or
seniors, three were aware of dual enrollment/dual credit programs in their
states, two were unaware of such programs, and one did not respond to that
question. The question was asked if the institution would accept any credits
from public dual enrollment/dual credit programs. Of all nine respondents, one
answered no, six answered yes (if the credit was a college credit), and
two did not answer that question.
The respondents were
asked if their institution offered general education college classes to high school
juniors and/or seniors. Seven out of nine respondents said “yes,” and listed
the following courses as those offered:
§
English,
Math, History, Psychology, Religion, Human Communications (Most 100-level
courses are available if the student can attend classes on campus)
§
Freshman
Composition I at two academies
§
All
GE (general education) classes are open to local seniors who get special
permission under our arrangements with local schools
§
All
classes
§
Freshman
comp. 1 & 2, Life Science, Math 101, History, Psychology 101, Art
Appreciation, Music Appreciation
§
College
writing, pre-calculus
§
Any
lower division course (on this campus only – subject to recommendation and GPA)
The last research
questions dealt with distance learning. Here the respondents’ answers and
opinions differed widely, from offering a number of classes and being fairly
positive about the potentials for learning through distance learning, to
offering no distance learning and expressing ambivalent or negative feelings
about distance learning. Eight out of nine respondents said their
college/university offered distance learning courses (see appendix for complete
listing). However, when asked, “What benefits do you see in offering general
education classes through distance education?” the respondents had the
following comments (comments here are numbered and correlate with comments in
the next paragraph regarding drawbacks of distance education):
1. Very, very few. The
personal contact is so important!
2. Allows the student to
accelerate his/her program
3. Not many
4. Generating additional
income
5. Supply/demand for
these courses are such that more students would have access
6. (No comment)
7. Provides students
opportunity to complete courses without having to physically attend class.
Students may want to get a jumpstart on college, finish sooner, or just take a
lighter load while on campus, then take courses during he summer while at home.
8. Reaching students who
don’t have local access to an SDA school; working with gifted students.
9. Broader geographic
reach; allows college influence at secondary level; allows exclusive program to
small number of students unable to access it in other ways.
The next question was similar but opposite:
“What drawbacks do you see for offering general education classes through
distance education?” Here are the respondents’ comments (correlated with the
numbered comments above):
1. (No comment: answer to
previous question was really an answer to the “drawbacks” question)
2. Lack of socialization,
cultural benefits of the college campus may not be available
3. For academy students –
lack of discipline and help
4. (No comment)
5. Volume of demand calls
for acquiring teachers in the general education curriculum
6. The lack of students
learning the values of general education subjects. There is a serious decline
in students’ ability to think and converse across discipline borders
7. Motivating students to
finish the class (especially if it is totally asynchronous with no start/end
date). It may be difficult to engage a student in the learning environment and they
may not feel a sense of community. This too may lead to lack of persistence.
8. Loses the
interpersonal touch of face-to-face. Finding capable, qualified teachers.
Oversight of course quality = more workload.
9. Cost of implementing
courses; motivating college teachers to think creatively about course creation
and content integration.
These
thoughts and attitudes are significant for the purpose of this study and the
recommendations that will be made. Reference will be made to them in subsequent
pages.
The
last question for the college/university respondents was regarding the support
their institution gives for the development of distance education courses.
Again, the numbered comments correlate to the previous two paragraphs:
1. (No comment)
2. We have in the past
paid for course development. As of now, funds are exhausted, and we no longer
pay for course development
3. Full time director and
software platform
4. (No comment)
5. College is partnering
with ADEC (Adventist Distance Education Consortium, www.adventistedu.org) as initial step
into this program
6. It supports BlackBoard
online educational software
7. Training for
BlackBoard; encouragement to attend seminars, workshops, and take courses
related to on-line learning course development (currently, we have not given
release time for course development)
8. Course development
stipends, conferences, part time support person, tech support.
9. Course development
incentive of $500 per student credit hour for creation of new online course.
Summary of AP/dual
enrollment/dual credit programs in Adventist Colleges
The
responses of the colleges/universities to the questions about AP courses and
dual enrollment indicate a significant understanding and acceptance of the
concept behind accepting dual credit. The respondents had procedures in place
to accept these credits, and no negative connotations were perceived. The
respondents’ answers to questions regarding distance learning, however,
indicated some significant hesitance about the use and benefit of this type of
educational instruction. The research questionnaire was not designed to probe
these feelings further, but additional research would answer the questions of
why the respondents answered in a neutral to somewhat negative manner overall.
Adventist
academies current practices in dual enrollment/dual credit
Questionnaires
were sent to 93 Adventist academies in the United States. Seventy-four percent
of the questionnaires (69) were completed and returned. The first question on
the questionnaire was the following: “Does your academy currently offer any
advanced placement classes for high school students?” Just over half (53%) of
the respondents said no. (See figure 3.)
Figure 3
Of
the 37 respondents who said they did NOT currently offer AP classes, 86% (32)
said they have considered offering such classes. Several respondents added pertinent and helpful information that
indicated why they did not currently offer AP classes but had considered doing
so. One respondent said, “We do not have teachers with free periods to take an
additional class.” Another respondent added that they were considering offering
AP classes, but had not “found the financed yet.” “Not enough staff,” and
“Funds are needed for their training” was the response from yet another
respondent. One school noted that it is considering offering AP classes two
years in the future. Another significant comment was the following: “Our
teachers feel it is in the best interest of the students to offer honors classes
instead of AP classes.” Still another respondent added to these sentiments by
saying “Our teachers are opposed to AP classes because they teach to a test. We
have our students take our regular broad foundations or honors classes and then
take the AP test at a local high school…Our students pass the AP tests but
still get the broad foundation of classes that go ‘beyond’ teaching to a
test!” Another academy, located near an Adventist college, reported that they
are enrolling in the College Board AP program for next year. “Our juniors and
seniors are able to take college classes, GPA requirements permitting, at Union
College,” they reported. “That took the place of our own AP program for years.
Next year, we will offer both.” One respondent commented that they have
arranged with Walla Walla College to teach four classes in a dual enrollment
situation. Perhaps the most significant comment (for the purpose of this study)
in this section by any respondent was one who said the following: “We do dual
enrollment with a local community college.”
Only
five of the 37 respondents who said they did not currently offer AP classes
indicated that they were not considering offering such classes. While no
explanation was either asked for nor given for the reasons why the academy is
not considering offering AP classes, it could be assumed based on the answers
to other questions that funding and staffing are two of the primary reasons for
not considering offering AP classes presently or in the future.
From the
responses to this particular question on the questionnaire, a significant
pattern can be seen. A significant percentage of academies that currently do
NOT offer AP courses have considered doing so. The reasons given, if any, for
not teaching those classes relate chiefly to finances and staffing. Some
academies located close in proximity to Adventist colleges have arranged for
their students to dual enroll, but one academy has resorted to a dual
enrollment situation at a local community college. While the questionnaire does
not ask the reason for this arrangement, nor does the respondent give the
reason, it is logical to assume that this academy is not located geographically
near any Adventist college so no such arrangement can be made with a
faith-based institution to offer dual enrollment. Currently no dual enrollment
programs are available to Adventist academy students who wish to take
distinctly Adventist college level courses (with the exception of Griggs
University courses) when the students’ local academy does not offer AP classes
or the academy is not located near an Adventist college/university.
A
large percentage of the respondents who reported that they have considered
offering AP classes also reported that they had not offered such classes in the
past. Twenty-six of the 37 respondents indicated they had not offered AP
courses in the past, as opposed to only eleven who had. Interestingly enough,
one respondent indicated they had offered AP courses in the past, but were not
considering doing so now. No explanation was given for this comment. (See
figure 4.)
Figure 4
Thirty-two of the total respondents (46%) answered “yes”
to the first question, “Does your academy currently offer any advanced
placement classes for high school students?” When asked to identify any
eligibility requirements, respondents’ answers varied significantly. All but
one of the 32 academies that offer AP courses identified some sort of
eligibility requirements. Seventeen of the 32 had GPA requirements. Of these
17, 11 academies required a GPA of 3.0 or better in order for students to take
AP classes. one academy required an overall GPA of 3.0, but a GPA of 3.5 or
better in the subject area of the AP class. One academy required a 3.3 overall
GPA, and four academies required a 3.5 or better GPA in order for students to
enroll in AP classes. (See figure 5.)
Figure 5

Fourteen of the 32
academies that offer AP courses allow both juniors and seniors to enroll. Of
these 14 academies, 11 have additional eligibility requirements such as minimum
GPA, invitation by instructor, or passing prerequisite classes with a minimum
grade (usually an A). One academy also allows sophomores to enroll in AP World
History. Ten of the academies allow
only seniors to enroll in AP classes. Of these 10, three mention additional
requirements, such as having a B or higher in English III as well as the
teacher recommendation; applying for the class by writing an essay and securing
a recommendation from a teacher in the same discipline; minimum GPA; and
demonstrating ability to handle the extra challenge. Of the remaining eight
academies that offer AP courses but do not have any age restrictions (junior or
junior and seniors), two have minimum GPA and other prerequisites
(classes, recommendation of instructor), one has minimum GPA only, three have
other prerequisites (classes, recommendation of instructor), and two have no
requirements listed, one of which noted: “AP classes are open to all high
school students – no GPA or age requirements.” (See figure 6.)
Figure 6
Respondents listed all
AP courses offered at their schools. The most popular single AP course is
calculus, with 11 academies offering this class (one academy offers it online
due to low enrollment). A number of AP English classes are offered at various
academies, including English (9), English IV (Literature) (3), English Language
and Composition (5), English Literature and Composition (5), and English
Composition 101 and 102 (2, one of which is taught by visiting college
professors). US/American History (7), Politics/American Government (4), and
World History (1) are the AP history classes offered. (For a complete listing,
see the appendix “Compiled AP Course List.”)
The questionnaire
asked respondents to note their process for conferring credit for AP classes.
Five of the 32 academies that offer AP (and in some cases dual credit) classes
did not answer that question. The other 27 had varying answers, most notably either
using the five point AP scale or granting the usual high school credit. (For a
complete listing of responses, see appendix “Process for conferring credit.”)
Only two of the 32 academies that offer AP and/or dual enrollment classes
reported that visiting college professors taught the class(es). In one case,
the academy reported that the students were charged extra for these classes,
and in the other case, the students paid directly to the visiting college for
the class(es).
One final statistic of
note from the survey of Adventist academies is the awareness of public dual
enrollment/dual credit programs. Of the 37 academies who reported no AP classes
being offered on their campuses, 27 were aware of other dual enrollment/dual
credit programs; 10 were unaware of such programs. Of the 32 academies that
reported offering AP courses, 20 were aware of other dual enrollment/dual
credit programs; eight were unaware of such programs, and four gave no answer.
Overall, 47 respondents, or 68%, were aware of other dual enrollment/dual
credit programs.
Summary of AP/dual enrollment/dual credit in
Adventist Academies
The Adventist
academies surveyed were very responsive to the research questionnaire, with 74%
completing and returning the survey instrument. Almost all questionnaires were
completely filled out, and many respondents added interesting and helpful
comments about AP courses at their academy. Close to half of all responding
academies indicated that they are offering one or more AP classes, or have
visiting college professors teaching advanced, dual enrollment/dual credit
classes on their campuses. Almost all academies that are currently not offering
AP classes are considering doing so. Teacher load and finances are some of the issues
preventing more academies from offering AP classes. It could possibly be
inferred that less than half of our Adventist young people have access to
advanced classes at our Adventist schools. However, because enrollment figures
were not included in the questionnaire, and because there is a higher
likelihood of larger enrollments at academies near Adventist
colleges/universities where academy students are often able to enroll in
college classes, it is more likely that more than half of our Adventist students
have access to advanced classes as academy juniors or seniors. Additional
questions and research could ascertain these facts more accurately. However, it
is safe to say that Adventist education has room to make significant strides in
offering advanced academy students an opportunity to accelerate their learning
in a faith-based setting.
Current trends in enrollment of Adventist
junior and senior high school students
In order to partially
answer the research question, “What are the perceptions of need for such
programs within Adventist education?” questionnaires were sent to 96 churches
in the North Pacific Union Conference of Seventh-day Adventist. Churches were
selected randomly based on membership and location in order for the sample to
be as representative of the Adventist population of the northwest as possible.
The data collected was analyzed quantitatively.
Figure 8
Membership range |
Percent/number of
churches of this size in the NPUC (Total # of churches: 466) |
Percent/number of
churches this size who received questionnaires |
Percent/number of
churches returning questionnaires |
|||
|
400 + |
12.0% |
56 |
10.4% |
10 |
10.0% |
1 |
|
200-399 |
18.0% |
84 |
16.7% |
16 |
25.0% |
4 |
|
100-199 |
26.2% |
122 |
21.9% |
21 |
23.8% |
6 |
|
0-99 |
43.8% |
204 |
51.0% |
49 |
36.7% |
18 |
|
Total |
100.0% |
466 |
20.6% |
96 |
30.2% |
29 |
The intent of the
church questionnaire was to discover, as best as possible, trends in school attendance
for Adventist students in the northwest, and to determine how many Adventist
students are currently taking advantage of public dual enrollment/dual credit
programs. The questionnaire was returned by 29 churches, or 30.2%. In this
questionnaire, church clerks were asked to identify where each high school
student and freshman college student had attended school from their high school
freshman year through their freshman year of college. For larger churches with
a large number of high school students, this was a big task. It follows, then,
that the smallest percentage of completed questionnaires were returned from the
largest churches.
In
the largest church that responded (the only church from the 400+ membership
category with a reported membership of 476), 27 out of 47 students total were
reported to have attended public school at least one of their high school
years. Nineteen of 47 attended the local 10 grade school for at least one year,
and eight of 47 attended the boarding academy for at least one year. Seven of
the 47 students attended home school at least one year, and no students
attended school in the “other” category (other Christian schools, distance
education, etc.). Additionally, no students were reported as being enrolled in
a local community college dual enrollment program. (See figure 9.)
Churches
with membership of 400+
Figure 9
In the next
category of churches (membership of 200-399), there were four respondents. The
total reported membership for these four churches was 1275, for an average
membership of approximately 319. Of these members, 79 were reported to be of
high school age. Forty-one of the 79 students attended public school at least
one year; 12 attended the local 10 or 12 grade school at least one year, and 12
attended the boarding academy at least one year. Seven attended homeschool one
or more years, three attended school in the “other” category, and one student
was enrolled in a local community college dual enrollment program. (See figure
10.)
Churches
with memberships of 200-399
Figure 10
In the
six responding churches with memberships of 100-199, the total membership
represented was 897, which is an average membership of approximately 150. The
total number of high school students reported in this group was 64. Of that
number, 30 had attended public school at least one year, 18 had attended the
local 10 or 12 grade school at least one year, 19 had attended the boarding
academy, six had been homeschooled, three had attended a school in the “other”
category, and two had attended a local community college dual enrollment
program. (See figure 11.)
Churches
with memberships of 100-199
Figure 11

The largest number of
respondents came from churches with the smallest memberships, which given the
size of the questionnaire respective to their church membership would have been
expected. The 18 churches responding with memberships of 1-99 represented a
total of 949 members and an average of approximately 53 members. The total
number of high school students reported in this group was 73. Of that number,
28 had attended public school at least one year, six had attended a local 10 or
12 grade school, 41 had attended the boarding academy, 21 had been
homeschooled, and three attended in the “other” category. (See figure 12.)
Churches
with memberships of 1-99
Figure 12
All of the charts in
this section represent numbers and percentages of students attending public,
Adventist, and other schools AT LEAST ONE YEAR (or in a few cases, part of a
year). Some students attended home school one year, public school another year,
and boarding academy yet another year. The total figures do not then
necessarily add up to the number of students, but rather give us ideas of
trends in high school attendance among Adventist students in the northwest.
Figure 13
Summary of church questionnaire responses
The response rate of the church questionnaires
was considerably lower than that of either the college/university or the
academy questionnaires. As has been mentioned, the reason for this low rate of
response is likely due to the length of the questionnaire relative to the size
of the congregation and number of high school aged students. The number of
college-aged students reported was very low and did not contribute
significantly to the scope of this study, so those figures were not reported.
An observation in regards to the church
surveys is that the larger churches, while they may have more access to
Adventist education at the high school level, nevertheless have a greater
percentage of students who attend the public schools at least one year. Some of
these students go on to attend boarding academy as juniors or seniors, but do
not attend the local 10 grade junior academy for their freshman and sophomore
years.
The number of students reported who had
attended high school at least one year was higher than I expected. The boarding school percentage was as strong as it
was in large part because of the seemingly passionate commitment of members
from the smallest churches to Adventist education. The percentage of public
school attendance in this group of churches was also significantly lower than
that in the other two groups of churches–both of which approached or surpassed
50%. This could be due to conservatism in smaller churches, less availability
of quality public schools, fewer local 10 or 12 grade schools, or many other
factors. Further research would be needed to ascertain the reasons for this
disparity.
Conversely, the number of students
reported who were involved in dual enrollment programs was less than I
expected. The town of Colville, WA, with a church membership of approximately 250
and approximately 13 academy-aged youth at any given time, has seen six or more
Adventist high school students take advantage of the local community college’s
Running Start program in the last several years. There are several potential
answers to this lack of reported involvement in dual enrollment programs in the
northwest. First, if only 68% of the respondents to the academy questionnaire
were aware of other dual enrollment options, it is feasible that the local
church would not be aware of similar options. Related to this possibility is
the idea that a number of the junior and senior high school students reported
on the questionnaire as attending the local public school could in actuality be
enrolled at the community college in a dual enrollment program and the church
family is simply not aware of the specifics of their enrollment. If, as has
been discussed earlier in the paper, 10% of Washington’s juniors and seniors
are enrolled in the Running Start program, it could be extrapolated that
perhaps as high as 5-10% of Adventist juniors and seniors are participating in
this program as well. It certainly is true, based on data collected from the
churches, that a high percentage of Adventist youth are attending public
schools rather than Adventist education. If, for instance, 5% of Adventist
juniors and seniors in the northwest were involved in dual enrollment, and if
approximately half of the students noted in the church questionnaires were
juniors and seniors, then it would follow that approximately 11 students would
be involved in dual enrollment programs rather than the three reported in the
questionnaires. However, with enrollment at Adventist junior and senior
academies decreasing nationwide, significant thought should be given to the
rise of enrollment in public dual enrollment/dual credit programs, especially
in light of the large percentage of Adventist high school students attending
public school rather than Adventist educational institutions in the northwest,
based on the results of the returned questionnaires.
Current Felt Needs for Academically
Challenging Coursework
In order to ascertain felts needs for a faith-based Adventist dual
enrollment program and complete the answer to the research question, “What are
the perceptions of need for such programs within Adventist education?” two
focus groups were conducted. The first focus group took place at a small
primarily boarding academy, on March 10, 2004. The second focus group took
place at a larger, primarily day academy, on April 8, 2004. Both focus groups
lasted approximately 90 minutes.
Focus Group 1:
Small Boarding Academy
Five parents (two males, three females)
of academically superior students joined me at the small academy for the first
focus group. Of these five participants, one had completed high school, two had
completed college, and two had completed postgraduate school. Additionally, all
five participants had attended Adventist schools for all of their high school
education. All five also indicated they had attended Adventist schools for part
or all of their college education as well. The two participants who had
completed postgraduate work reported attending some or all of the time in an
Adventist educational system. All of the participants had at least one child in
college, and two of the participants had a child in academy as well. None of
the five participants reported having any students in elementary school or
postgraduate school. This information signals a significant commitment to
Adventist education within the members of this focus group. (Note: in order to
maintain confidentiality, genders of respondents will be identified randomly
and not necessarily by the actual gender of the participant making the
particular statement.)
The small academy is a private
Adventist high school situated in the middle of a state with a minimal
concentration of Adventists (3,500 members) and a small population overall.
Predictably, the enrollment at the academy is low (78 students) and finances
are understandably troublesome. No advanced placement courses are currently
offered at the small academy.
Participants were first asked if
they were aware of dual enrollment options at community colleges in many
states. While several participants indicated a knowledge of advances placement
options in other high schools, there seemed to be a lack of awareness of dual
enrollment programs either in their state or in other states. Said one
participants, “I didn’t know that junior colleges offered [dual enrollment/dual
credit classes].” As we discussed ideas related to both dual enrollment/dual
credit and advanced placement courses, several themes began to emerge. The main
themes of the focus group, related to dual enrollment/dual credit
possibilities, were:
§
Financial
benefits to students potential financial/enrollment benefits to school
§
Academic
benefits to students
§
Versatility
of credit for students
§
Educational
concerns with face-to-face teachers losing bright students
§
Distance
learning component: pros and cons
§
Financial/enrollment
loss to school
Several participants discussed the
possibilities of a dual enrollment/dual credit program being financially
advantageous to students and their parents who pay the bills. Most of these
comments had to do with the pricing structure of the dual enrollment/dual
credit classes at the college level. “They [the college] could some way look at
partially financially underwriting [the courses] as a whole pack, realizing
that they have a chance of getting any one of these students coming to their
school and then giving a little bit of financial incentive to encourage that
kid to go to that school initially. Underwriting it at the high school level
would be a lot easier for kids in rural [their state] to participate.” Another
participant added to that thought process: “Maybe they can look at doing some
kind of scholarship, GPA scholarship, or something like that.”
There seemed to be a general consensus
that there would be a financial benefit to the students, but only if the college(s)
could work out an attractive formula for tuition costs.
Another potential financial benefit
that was mentioned briefly was the possibility of picking up a few additional
students because dual enrollment/dual credit options were offered at the small
boarding academy. “[This would be better] if you could demonstrate that it
might pull two of three more students into that school that offset the losses
of the tuition of the classes they’re not taking.” It might be the turning
point for somebody who isn’t quite sure about sending their child here as a
junior. If we had a program in place where they could also do some of their
college credit at the same time, there might be some people in distant places
in [our state] who would make the decision to go ahead and send them here if
that was another drawing card,” to which another participant added, “So
[tuition and enrollment] might even out.” A participant noted the potential
impact on the school if they did NOT participate in a dual enrollment/dual credit
option: “If it’s available and they’re trying to decide between here and three
or four other boarding schools that are within a [reasonable distance] and it’s
not offered [here], then you might lose people.”
The second area of positive feedback
about a dual enrollment/dual credit program was in the area of academic
benefits to the students. The focus group participants were by design parents
of academically superior students who either would have or could benefit from
such programs. Several statements from participants pointed to either their
students or other academy students being able to benefit academically from dual
enrollment/dual credit programs: “We have some really bright students here that
could maybe benefit by one or two of them going into this program”; “I see
[reaching those who don’t send their kids here because advanced placement
classes that are taught in the local high school and various places in their
communities] as probably the most valuable thing in all this program is to
those groups of people and to the occasionally extremely bored student who is
not doing much now.” This participant that acknowledged that all of his kids
would have been in this group of students who would have benefited from dual
enrollment/dual credit programs. One participant noted what I found in the
literature about the success of dual enrollment/dual credit programs in
preparing students for college: “I think that the really important stuff is
that these kids with one or two [dual enrollment/dual credit] classes per
quarter starting out will have a pretty good idea of what college is like
because they are at a different level of commitment. I think that is one of the
more important things you could learn before you get to college.”
The participants in the first focus
group also noted interest in ensuring that the credit earned in any dual
enrollment/dual credit classes would be versatile. In other words, it should be
able to transfer to any other college if the student chose to enroll elsewhere
at any time. “Yes, I think that the important thing [is that] it would be
versatile where you could go from college to college with [the credits]. If the
credit would not be recognized by Pacific Union College or Southwesterrn or
Andrews University, that’s not going to work. I wouldn’t want my kid bothering
with it. But if [the credit] was something that could be transferred even to an
in-state college, I would be real interested in that. It has to be versatile,”
shared one participant. There was agreement indicated from other participants
at this statement.
While significant interest was
expressed in having the small boarding academy participate in a dual
enrollment/dual credit program, several areas of concern were discussed as
well. One of the participants was a teacher at the school, and comments from
other participants indicated that this teacher’s class was of a very high
caliber. Comments were made the indicated strong support for this teacher and a
desire to have students take her class. “I would hate to see the kids miss [the
classes she teaches]. That would be a really tough decision to make with my
child even though I know it would help him to get college credits [if he took
these classes through dual enrollment/dual credit.” A further support of
face-to-face classes was also a show of support for the teacher present. “You
take the brightest students out of the classes that sometimes add the most to
the classes. [These students] add so much to the rest of her class and really
help inspire her to be a teacher on campus. I would just hate to see the top
five or six kids removed from her class.”
The comments about protecting and
supporting the quality teachers on campuses, however, was followed by
additional comments that demonstrated a willingness to think of ways to
incorporate good face-to-face teaching with dual enrollment/dual credit
utilizing distance education. (Because of the proximity of Adventist
institutions of higher learning to most Adventist young people in America, a
majority of Adventist high school students who would be eligible for and/or
interested in Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit courses would have to take
them utilizing distance education.) One participant suggested that we combine a
distance education class with face-to-face instruction: “They [could be] in the
class and then [take] extra stuff home on the computer to maybe qualify as a
credit class,” suggested one participant. “Yeah,” added another, “if there was
some way to combine the resources of what you have on campus…[we would not have]
to waste those resources.” The distance learning aspect that was discussed as a
means of distributing the Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit courses was
discussed with reservation by the participants. “If you say these are distance
learning classes that my child would be in I’m not sure that I’m quite as
excited about it as if it is a class on campus that is being taught. When they
are in with the group here, [they’re] interactive with the kids that they’re
going to school with.” Another participant responded with, “With distance
learning, it is kind of a difficult thing to integrate the kids into the class.
We tried to do a Spanish I and II class like that and [it was] difficult,” even
when “we tried to have the kids meet the class at the same time so they were
interacting with kids all over the state.” One member of the focus group had
taken a distance learning class recently and reported that it was “a very
frustrating experience for me.” However, there was positive feedback about
using distance learning as the medium for distributing Adventist dual
enrollment/dual credit courses. One participant noted that using distance
learning for these classes could enable students to stay on academy campuses
and continue to contribute to the school as a whole. “If the distance learning
can involve integrating students into the classroom that is already on
campus...that would be the ideal situation.” One participant had a final
suggestion for those who may be planning the types of courses to offer for dual
enrollment/dual credit: “Remember that everybody learns differently, so that if
you can incorporate visual learning by hearing and actual tactile learning,
that’s going to help students a lot more than if it’s all visual; there are
people who don’t learn very well visually.”
Chief among the concerns expressed by
participants was potential financial loss for the school. From the comments
given, it was evident that these participants were very loyal supporters of the
small academy. One participant said the following: “I think finance is going to
be your most difficult task and I’ll tell you why. Sixty to seventy percent of
our students currently get worthy student funds. If they have to pay full
tuition to go to our school and additional tuition for advanced placement, [the
college offering the dual enrollment program]…is going to have to be real
creative and figure out ways of financing it so it’s not a huge impact. I’m on
the Academy Operating Board, the K-12 Board, and also the [Union Conference]
K-12 board, and I can tell you right now, [financing is] going to be really the
crux of the matter here.” The issue of finances at the academy surfaced several
times throughout the session. Another participant added, “I’m looking at a
deficit in our budget. I know all the other boarding academies, or most of them
across America, are looking at the same thing. They’re going to have a tough
time giving up their tuition.” “They can’t afford to not charge as much,” added
another participant, and still another said,” That’s where you are going to
meet your greatest resistance. [The finances] are something that needs to be
very creative – that, along with the college credit that comes as part of the
package.” Later in the session, a participant said he saw real danger in
opening dual enrollment/dual credit options up to juniors and seniors,
“especially in [our state],” and stated that he saw that as a drain to their
academy. He went on to discuss the family atmosphere that exists on the small
academy campus, and said that if dual enrollment/dual credit students were
allowed to participate in the classes via distance learning and were only on
camps for short periods of time, if at all (as we had been discussing as an
option), he “would see that more as being disruptive to campus life. The campus
here is a family and the family operates best when we’re all living together.”
A participant summed up the feelings of the group when she stated, “The school
cannot afford the loss of three kids to (the dual enrollment/dual credit]
program, so I think that is some of the reason that the feedback you’re getting
here is that we can’t afford to go the other way.”
While both positive and negative
comments were made regarding all aspects of Adventist dual enrollment/dual
credit, the final comments were encouraging: “I think you’re on the right
track. I definitely think that this is something that’s out there and it’s
becoming more readily available. If our education system doesn’t get involved,
we’re going to be left behind and we’re going to be losing people.”
Focus Group 2:
Large Day Academy
Nine parents (four males, five females)
of academically superior students joined me on the campus of the large academy
for the second focus group. Of these nine participants, two had completed high
school, three had completed college, and four had completed some postgraduate
training. Three participants reported having attended no Adventist education
themselves; no participant reported completing all of their education in the
Adventist school system. Five participants reported having attended Adventist
schools for all of their high school years, and three of these participants
also attended all of their college years in Adventist education. All of the
participants currently have at least one child in high school, and three
participants have one child in college as well. Four participants additionally
have children in grades K-8.
The large academy is a day-academy
serving a large valley. Students from this valley area as well as from an
adjoining state attend this academy. Its enrollment is currently 279. The large
academy is located approximately two blocks from an Adventist college campus.
The valley area where the large academy is located has a high concentration of
Adventists, as does the Conference in general (23,200 members). The population
of the state in general (6,068,996), and the valley in specific (37,504) where
the large academy is located, is much greater that that in the state in general
(909,453) and in the city in specific (27,509) where the small academy is
located. Correspondingly, it is not surprising that enrollment at large day
academy is high compared to that at the small boarding academy.
The atmosphere during the second focus
group was significantly different than the first focus group. While in the
first focus group the parents were understandably concerned about enrollment at
their own academy, the issue of losing students to a distance-learning based
dual enrollment/dual credit program never came up at all. The large academy
currently has several AP courses that it offers, and a few (seven-eight FTE)
senior students can attend classes on the campus of the nearby Adventist
college. The large academy’s enrollment has remained stable through the years
and therefore the issue of finances for the academy itself was never mentioned.
The issues discussed did not focus on any particular area, as they had in the
first focus group, but were rather more broad-based questions, comments,
suggestions, and words of encouragement.
While the state where the large academy
is located has a very strong dual enrollment/dual credit program, the
participants could only think of one student who had participated in this
program, and “she wanted to come back and graduate with her class, so she
didn’t do all of the second year there.” For these participants, the reasons
they noted for the necessity of dual enrollment/dual credit courses were
focused much more on academic benefits than on financial benefits, although the
latter was mentioned as a strong incentive for participation. “Education s
really expensive,” said one participant. “There are many things our kids in
academy can be involved in where they don’t have to be taking credits. There
are lots of different opportunities they can do. So, the bottom line for me is
if they can save a lot of money. It’s expensive to put kids through school so
the freer it is I think the better this program will catch on. If it’s going to
be just a little nickel-dime type stuff, to me I don’t think it’s worth it.” He
continued: “If a student can really benefit by the academic performance
allowing them to have less cost, I see that as a real benefit.”
Related to the financial issue were
some suggestions from participants as to how the colleges could make these dual
enrollment/dual credit classes more available. We had just discussed the option
of students taking the “Ability to Benefit” test, a federal standardized test
that assesses whether a student who had not completed high school or did not
have their GED would benefit from enrolling in and taking a college level
course. Taking and passing this test allows students to qualify for federal
grants and scholarships, thereby making college level courses through the
Adventist dual enrollment/dual program more affordable. “I want to address the
piece of having grants,” said one participant. “There are a lot of people here
in this valley who may not be eligible for a grant who might want to send their
child to the college as part of this program, so I think it might be better if
it’s somehow incorporated into the academy program where you didn’t have to pay
just regular college tuition.” Another participant, a faculty at the college,
referred to a document in her hands that was to be presented that day at the
college faculty senate, but time did not allow for its presentation. She
mentioned that the college was looking at a substantial decrease in tuition for
dual enrollment/dual credit classes, being called Adventist LEAP (Leading Edge
Accelerated Program), and working with the academies and their tuition
structure. Additional comments related to finances included questions about
whether the colleges had the money and personnel to support the academies.
“It’s going to cost them some money, perhaps; it’s a financial issue. But
obviously if they can hook these students early…you’re not going to lose them
to the other areas around.”
Several comments from the participants
focused on the academic benefits of an Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit
program. One participant noted that many of the students from the elementary
school associated with the large academy “have been doing academy work while
they’re at [the elementary school], and it just seems very natural to carry
that on. What are they going to do? They’re going to run in to a dead end about
when they’re a sophomore or junior.” “Math is a real issue right now,” added
another participant. “A lot of the 8th graders have algebra and
geometry under their belts before they come [to the large academy]. So by your
freshman year you take Algebra 2, sophomore year you do pre-calculus, advanced
data. They hit this roadblock right after they’re a sophomore and they say,
‘Now what do I do?’” This situation causes an additional problem mentioned by
the participants. Some juniors and seniors run into problems when taking their
SAT’s. As one participant put it, “Some of these students who are taking SAT’s
– some of these students who are very bright – haven’t had a math class for two
years,” to which a participant replied, “I know with my son, he’ll be pretty
much out of math classes after this year (his sophomore year).”
Participants also discussed the ability
of a dual enrollment/dual credit program to prepare and encourage students to
attend college, as did the participants in the first focus group. Said one
participant from the second focus group, “I think they would find that they
would be able to do those [college] classes. ‘I can do this. I can do college
level work. What a motivating factors that is, and I have college credits.’”
“The sooner they can get into being able to continue their education, the more
time they have to make a decision and the more information they have,” added
one participant after talking about how students don’t always end up doing that
they came to do in college.
One area that the participants
discussed was related to students attending the local community colleges,
whether it be for regular college courses or dual enrollment courses with
Running Start. A participant relayed his own experience in the community
college where he engaged in some “interesting discussions that took place
there. I’m not sure it’s appropriate for a freshman to engage in those
soul-searching arguments with the lit teacher at 10 o’clock at night. I think
there are some positive things that come out of that sometimes. I think that
there are some risks perhaps.” Another participant responded with, “I think
you’re right. Not every freshman student is in a position to maybe do that and
feel comfortable with that and be successful with that.”
Perhaps the strongest statements in
this focus group came from parents wanting to have their students stay involved
with their classmates on the local academy campus. “I was just talking to [my
son] earlier today. I cautioned him. I think his senior year at academy is a
very special time. I would encourage him to maybe take a class over [at the
college], but I really encouraged him not to skip his senior year here.” She
continued to relate her own experience as a student at the large academy when
friends of hers were involved in a lot of things outside the school, which was
neat, she said, “but yet they couldn’t go on class trips. They found out that
they just weren’t participating with their class that last senior year. I think
some might look back and say, ‘I wish I had hung with that group I graduated
with a little bit more.’” Another participant added to that thought: “I talked
to a young lady from my class last year who felt the same way. She was out at a
half-day college and half here and she just didn’t feel connected.”
The second focus group spent very
little time discussing the distance education component of the Adventist LEAP
courses currently being proposed and discussed during this meeting. “If [the
course] is online, your staff wouldn’t restrict what classes would be offered
since it would be over the Internet,” one participant commented. There was a
general sense from the discussion that using distance education to distribute
these courses would make them versatile and allow students to work them into
their current schedule at the academy, thereby enabling them to stay on campus
and connected to their classmates, an issue of concern with this focus group.
One participant summarized what many
had been saying when he said, “We lose a lot of bright students to other kinds
of programs. The college likes those students.
We lose them to a lot of different places.” During the closing minutes,
he added, “From a church standpoint we do lose a lot of the bright kids. We
lose them to public school situations, public university situations, and then
we lose them altogether. I think we’re looking at trying to keep them and tie
them in. Our church needs that.”
Summary of
Focus Groups
The first focus group had a wide
variety of questions and concerns about an Adventist dual enrollment/dual
credit program. Their fear of losing students to this program was significant
and realistic. Their enrollment is such that they cannot afford to lose even a
handful of students, and while they realized that they might gain some students
if they participated in this program, their passion for and commitment to Small
academy and its future made them cautious about the program overall. They
could, however, see several benefits to participating in dual enrollment/dual
credit programs and seemed interested in knowing more about how they will work,
especially as related to the finances. Two of the five participants requested a
copy of this study when it was completed.
The second focus group spent a
considerable amount of time asking questions about how far along WWC was in
actually implementing Adventist LEAP. Most comments from participants were
positive and encouraging. They could
see financial and academic benefits, and did not seem to be less interested in
the program because of its reliance on distance education as the means of
distributing the courses. Because THE LARGE ACADEMY is not in danger of closing
its doors if a handful of students were to go elsewhere for their education,
and perhaps more importantly, because THE LARGE ACADEMY already offers some
college-early type programs, the tenor of this session was noticeably different
from the one in the first focus group.
Conclusion
and Recommendation
Dual enrollment programs are widespread
and have been proven to be beneficial for students. All 50 states have some
form of dual enrollment. These programs are being used in many states as a way
to encourage high school students to continue their education at the college
level, something that is becoming more and more necessary to success. These programs
can be instrumental in alleviating a condition identified as “Senior Slump.”
Students in most dual enrollment programs attend classes on a community college
campus, but some private schools also offer these courses, and some programs
utilize distance education as the medium for distributing the courses.
Adventist colleges and universities are
open to the idea of granting dual credit for some classes and are quite
familiar with the AP courses offered at many academies. There appear to be no significant
negative feelings toward granting dual credit, but colleges and universities
are more resistant to distance education courses. Adventist academies offer
limited options for dual enrollment in the form of AP courses for the most
part, and only slightly over half of the academies responding to the survey
offered these courses. Most academies that do not currently offer AP courses
were considering offering them in the future.
A high percentage of Adventist students
are currently attending schools other than Adventist schools, the largest
percentage of this number attending public education. No significant numbers of
Adventist students were identified as attending local dual enrollment/dual
credit programs, perhaps because such students are enrolled in them without the
knowledge of the local church clerk who was reporting school attendance among
church members.
While the church clerk surveys did not
indicate that Adventist education is losing significant numbers of students to
dual enrollment/dual credit programs, the focus groups, particularly the second
group, indicated a significant need for Adventist education to offer
faith-based dual enrollment/dual credit options. Significant questions about
Adventist dual enrollment/dual credit programs are present, but can be answered
with time, careful listening, and thoughtful planning. Because public education
is far ahead of Adventist education in terms of implementing dual
enrollment/dual credit programs, as well as in utilizing distance education for
these (and other) college level courses, dual enrollment/dual credit programs
should be developed in order to offer Adventism’s bright young minds an
opportunity to advance their learning in the faith-based setting we value so
much.
References
Andrews, H. (2000). The Dual-Credit
Explosion in Illinois Community Colleges. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the
World Wide Web: http://www.ibhe.state.il.us/CPDC/PDF/2001/0108Dual-CrResearch%20BriefIL.pdf.
Bailey, T., & Karp, M.
(2003). Promoting College Access and Success: A Review of Credit-Based
Transition Programs. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ovae/pi/cclo/crdbase.doc.
Catron, R. (1998). The
Virginia Plan for Dual Enrollment: A Historical Perspective. Inquiry.
Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web; http://www.vccaedu.org/inquiry/inquiry-spring98/i21catro.html
Center for Distance Education, Northwestern
Colleges. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the
World Wide Web: http://nwc.edu/distance/programs/
Cleveland, D. 2002. Out
of the Blocks: Hawaii’s Running Start Program. Retrieved April 30, 2004
from the World Wide Web: http://www.hcc.hawaii.edu/hcc_research/RS.pdf.
Cleveland, D. Maslowski, J.
2002. The Second Lap / HCC’S Running Start Program: Second Year Evaluation.
Retrieved April 30, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.hcc.hawaii.edu/hcc_research/secondlap.htm.
College Early Start
Program, College Credit Opportunities.
Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.deltacollege.org/dept/ar/admissions/ces.html
Cresswell, J. (2002). Educational Research. Upper Saddle
River. Merril Prentice Hall.
Early College Entrance
Program, Ohio Valley College. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.ovc.edu/base.cfm?page_id=938
Edwards, J. (2001, June). Bringing
Secondary Education into the Information Age: Universal College Preparation.
Education Commission of the States. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World
Wide Web: www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/26/54/2654.doc.
Hale, G. (2002). Postsecondary
Options: Dual/Concurrent Enrollment. Education Commission of the States Center for Community College
Policy. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/28/11/2811.doc.
Hanson, S. (2001, October).
Running Start 2000-01 Annual Progress Report, State Board for Community and
Technical Colleges. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/data/rsrchrpts/runstart_a01.pdf.
Hoffman, N. (2003,
July-August). College credit in high school:
increasing college attainment rates for underrepresented students.
Change. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World
Wide Web; http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m1254/4_35/104209670/p6/article.jhtml?term=.
Joppe,
M. The Research Process. Retrieved June 6, 2004 from the World Wide Web:
http://www.ryerson.ca/~mjoppe/rp.htm
Kirst,
M. (2001, May). Overcoming the High School Senior Slump: New Education
Policies. Retrieved April 30, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/27/03/2703.htm.
Full text not available.
Koenninger et al.
(2002-2003). Running Start Annual Progress Report. State of Washington
State Board for Community and Technical Colleges. Retrieved April 29. 2004 from
the World Wide Web: http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/data/rsrchrpts/runstart_a03.pdf.
National
Commission on the High School Senior Year. (2001, October) Raising our Sights: No High School Senior Left Behind. Retrieved April 30, 2004 from the World Wide
Web: http://www.woodrow.org/CommissionOnTheSeniorYear/Report/FINAL_PDF_REPORT.pdf
Peterson,
K. (2003, January). Overcoming the Senior Slump: The Community College Role.
ERIC Digests.
Post-secondary Enrollment Options.
Concordia College. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://web.csp.edu/pseo/media/pseo_factsheet.pdf
Running Start. 2003. Running
Start: A progress report from the State
Board for Community and Technical Colleges. Retrieved April 28th,
from the World Wide Web: http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/legislative/OnePagers/2003/Running%20Start%20one-pager.pdf.
Schuh, B. (2001, February 1). Early
College Program Proposed for Fall.
The Guilfordian. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Wed: http://www.guilfordian.com/news/2002/02/01/News/Early.College.Program.Proposed.For.Fall-175208.shtml.
Southwest Minnesota
State University. Post Secondary Enrollment Options at Southwest Minnesota
State University: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from
the World Wide Web: http://www.southwest.msus.edu/advising_center/PSEO%20FAQ1.htm.
Syracuse University
Project Advance.
Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://supa.syr.edu/SupaOnline/factsheet.html.
Texas Academy of Leadership in the Humanities. Retrieved April
29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://dept.lamar.edu/taolith/
Western Piedmont
Community College Concurrent Enrollment. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ets.wpcc.edu/Forms/ConcurrentEnrollment.pdf
Appendix A
Definitions
Definition
of Advanced Placement classes:
Advanced placement classes are college-level
classes generally taken at a high school and taught by qualified teachers.
Students have the option of taking AP tests for college credit. Results are
scored from one to five with most colleges awarding credit for scores of three
or above on AP exams.
Appendix
B
Chart 1: State
policies and information for Dual/Concurrent Enrollment Policies:
State
|
Definition
of Dual/Concurrent
Policy
|
Dual/Concurrent
Enrollment Policy
|
Who
Pays for Dual/Concurrent Enrollment? |
Postsecondary
or
Secondary
Credit
Earned |
Incentives
for Dual/Concurrent Enrollment
|
Unique
Characteristics of Dual/Concurrent Enrollment Programs |
|
Alabama |
Standard definition |
State board of education policy enables high
school students to take college courses for credit at two-year colleges. |
Student or school district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Alaska |
Standard
definition |
Dual enrollment is on an institutional
basis. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Arizona |
Standard definition |
A 1984 law stipulates that qualified high
school students may enroll in community college and university courses. Community
colleges may offer dual enrollment courses on high school campuses taught by
high school instructors who are certified to teach those courses using
community college syllabi and texts. Policies vary by community college
district. |
Student Student pays standard tuition and community
colleges are reimbursed by the state. |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Courses are accepted on transfer |
No information available |
|
Arkansas |
Dual enrollment
is defined as a high school student enrolled in a postsecondary institution
for college-level credit only. Concurrent enrollment
is defined as a high school student who is enrolled in a postsecondary
institution for both high school and college-level credit. |
|
The student pays but the high school district
may pay for the student if it so chooses. |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
Private businesses often pay tuition for
dual/concurrent enrollment students in order to expose the students to
college. Community colleges sometimes
waive tuition fees for dual/concurrent enrollment students in exchange for
the space that the high schools provide. |
|
California California (continued) |
Dual enrollment
is defined as a student who is admitted jointly to a two-year and a four-year
institution so that the student does not have to apply to the four-year
institution after he/she completes specified courses. Concurrent enrollment
is defined as a high school student who is enrolled in a postsecondary
institution while still in high school. |
|
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
State law on concurrent enrollment
authorizes but does not designate concurrent enrollment requirements. |
|
Colorado |
Standard definition |
The 1988 Postsecondary Enrollment Options
Act, C.R.S. 22-35-101…111, allows junior and senior high school students
to take college courses at both public and nonpublic higher education
institutions and to receive high school and/or college credit, which is what
determines whether the school or college may claim state support. Students
enrolled under the Postsecondary Options Act are not eligible for state or
federal financial aid. The Fast Track Program, C.R.S. 22-34-101,
is for 12th-grade students who have fulfilled their high school graduation
requirements. Under this act a college and school district may set up a
mutual agreement. Unlike the Postsecondary Options Act, a student may carry a
full college course load in the Fast Track program. (In the Postsecondary
Options program a student may carry only two college courses per academic
term.) Fast Track students earn college credit and have full rights and
privileges as high school students but not as college students. |
Student or school district. School district reimburses student only if
the student presents evidence of passing the college courses. If the student fails the courses, the
student or their guardians must pay. |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
The Colorado Postsecondary Enrollment
Options Act was one of the first in the nation to allow a 13th grade for high
schoolers. This permits a high school student to graduate from high school at
the same time as earning his or her Associate of Arts degree. Distance
education also is widely used. |
|
Connecticut |
Standard definition |
Community colleges and the University of
Connecticut have separate programs for high school students taking college
courses for credit. |
Student or community colleges Community colleges often waive tuition and
fees. |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Usually no problem in transferring dual
enrollment credits |
Dual enrollment programs are primarily
vocational/tech-prep. |
|
Delaware |
Standard definition |
Dual enrollment is on an institutional
basis. |
School district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
There are no problems in transferring
credits. |
School district pays for transportation,
books and tuition. |
|
Florida Florida (continued) |
Dual enrollment is
defined as a high school student enrolled in postsecondary courses for both
high school and college-level credit. |
A law enacted in 1973 (FS240.116(1)) provides
options to high school students such as dual enrollment, vocational dual
enrollment, early admission, the Advanced Placement Program, credit by
examination and the International Baccalaureate Program. Joint dual
enrollment and Advanced Placement courses must be incorporated within and
subject to district inter-institutional articulation agreement provisions.
The statute states that the dual enrollment program is for eligible high
school students to enroll in postsecondary courses creditable toward a
vocational certificate, associate degree or baccalaureate degree. Students
enrolled in postsecondary courses that are not creditable toward the high
school diploma shall not be classified as dually enrolled. Students are
permitted to enroll in these programs during school hours, after school and
during the summer. The State Board of Education shall adopt rules for any
dual enrollment programs involving requirements for high school graduation.
The Department of Education shall also develop guidelines for comparability
across school districts of both student and teacher qualifications for dual
enrollment courses. Student qualifications for dual enrollment include: a
common placement exam, a 3.0 unweighted grade-point average and for students
enrolling in vocational certificate courses, a 2.0 unweighted gradepoint
average. Exceptions to the GPA
requirements can be made if the educational institutions agree and the terms
of the agreement are contained within the dual enrollment inter-institutional
articulation agreement. |
State |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Under Florida law, dually enrolled students
are not assessed student fees, which represents a substantial savings for
students. There are few course restrictions, a common course numbering system
and quality assurance guidelines.
Through enrollment high school students can get a head start on their
college education without giving up important high school experiences. A 1996
Postsecondary Education Planning Commission study found that dual enrollment
allows students to (1) fulfill college-level educational requirements while
still in high school; (2) enter college with career goals already in mind;
(3) save time because they need not duplicate coursework already completed in
high school; (4) save money because college tuition is not charged for
courses taken in high school; (5) receive postsecondary credit when they
pursue a degree at a college or university; (6) enrich their high school
curriculum as well as their college program with advanced courses related to
their career. |
Dual enrollment and Advanced Placement are the
major forms of articulated acceleration for students who are admitted into
Florida postsecondary education institutions. All 28 colleges participate in dual enrollment. The number of
students participating in both programs steadily increased between 1992-99.
More students participate in Advanced Placement than in dual enrollment, but
the average dual enrollment student takes more accelerated courses than the
average AP student. |
|
Georgia |
Joint enrollment is
defined as an 11th- or 12th-grade high school student who enrolls in
postsecondary courses while still in high school. Early admission programs
allow a high school student to enroll in postsecondary courses full-time
following junior year of high school. |
1995 GA. CODE ANN. 20-2-161.1 stipulates
that any 11th- or 12th-grade student in any public school may apply to enroll
in selected courses at a postsecondary institution. Georgia’s statewide Joint
Enrollment Program allows high school students to graduate earlier. Students
must meet statewide minimum admissions standards (which can be increased at
the campus level). The standards are based on SAT/ACT scores, GPA, the
exemption of all LS requirements for early admission, a written
recommendation from a high school counselor/principal, written consent from a
parent/guardian if under 18, and finally, the student must complete the
University System of Georgia College Preparatory Curriculum requirements. In
the early admission program, a student may enroll full time as a college
student following junior year of high school. |
State |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
The Joint Enrollment Program allows students
to graduate earlier even though it is not officially recognized as an accelerated
baccalaureate program. |
Georgia has an early admissions program
which permits students to enroll full time in college courses following their
junior year of high school. |
|
Hawaii |
Standard definition |
The 2000 legislature passed a Running Start
measure. There has always been an early admit policy. |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
Hawaii’s dual enrollment program, modeled after
the Washington State Running Start Program, is in the process of being
implemented. |
|
Idaho |
Standard definition |
The 1997 Postsecondary Enrollment Options
Act allows 11th- or 12th-grade students to apply to any eligible
public/nonpublic, two- or four-year higher education institution but they may
only enroll in nonsectarian courses. |
Student, school district or community
college |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
There are no problems in transferring dual
enrollment credit. |
Idaho was the first state to allow high
school students to take college courses full time. |
|
Illinois |
Standard definition |
Board of Education policies encourage AP
courses. The Illinois Community College Board has developed policies
governing admission to postsecondary courses by high school students. The
board also has developed funding policies for dual enrollment courses. Most
college courses are offered by community colleges. |
Student or school district. It is a local decision
as to who pays the tuition costs for dually enrolled students. |
|
More educational options |
No information available |
|
Indiana |
Standard definition |
The 1997 Postsecondary Enrollment Options Act
permits high school juniors and seniors (and gifted and talented 9th and 10th
graders) to enroll in courses on college campuses if they meet specified
entrance requirements. No state mandates exist for college credit options for
high school students, though statute allows such programs. Higher education
institutions and schools may develop their own agreements and decide whether
or not to provide or accept college credit programs. The 1996 Code
20-10.1-15-4 stipulates that high school students may obtain secondary
credit for courses taken at a postsecondary institution. |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
More educational options |
No information available |
|
Iowa Iowa (continued) |
Standard definition |
The 1987 Postsecondary Enrollment Options
Act permits 11th- and 12th-grade students to enroll part time in
nonsectarian college courses in eligible institutions. A gifted and talented
student, according to the school’s criteria, may also enroll in college courses
(Iowa Code section 247.43). A student may enroll part-time in an
eligible postsecondary institution for no more than four semester terms or
six quarter terms unless identified as a gifted and talented 9th- or
10th-grade student. Students may enroll in any of the three state
universities, the 15 public community colleges, and accredited private
institutions as defined in Iowa’s Code section 261-9(5) and are
eligible for the Iowa Tuition Grant Program. Students must meet entrance
requirements for postsecondary courses as determined by the postsecondary
institution before they can enroll. Students may not enroll in eligible
postsecondary courses if the high school in which a student is enrolled
offers a comparable course. |
Student or school district. The school
district pays unless the student does not successfully complete the college
course(s), in which case the student must pay. |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Gifted and talented 9th and 10th graders may
enroll in postsecondary courses. School district pays the cost of the course.
|
Students and parents receive counseling
about the Postsecondary Options Act. Gifted and talented students at the 9th-
or 10th-grade level may enroll in postsecondary courses. |
|
Kansas |
Standard definition |
Enacted in 1993, the Kansas Challenge to
Secondary Schools Pupils Act (72-11a01-72-11a05 Citation of Act. (a) K.S.A.
and amendments thereto) stipulates that 11th-and 12th-grade high school
students may enroll in postsecondary courses if they meet the following
criteria: (1) Student is a high school junior or senior as designated by the
unified school district. (2) Student has the permission of the high school
principal to enroll. A form must be completed and signed by the high school
principal allowing the student to enroll in college courses. (3) The course
must be a college course approved by the Kansas Department of Education and
taught with the same requirements as any other college course. (4) The Board
of Education of any school district and any eligible postsecondary
institution may enter into an agreement regarding dual enrollment of high
school students. This includes an agreement concerning academic credit for
coursework, the requirement that the coursework be counted toward a degree,
and how much the student pays for tuition. (5) The college must provide
verification to the high school that the student is attending class. (6) Only
students enrolled for college credit can be carried on the class roster. |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Dual enrollment offers more educational
options, as well as funding incentives for community colleges and
universities to participate. |
College must provide verification to the school
district that the student is attending class. |
|
Kentucky Kentucky (continued) |
Dual enrollment
is defined as a high school student who has completed junior year and who is
enrolled in postsecondary courses. |
Do to deregulation, the Council on
Postsecondary Education will no longer have a dual enrollment policy.
Admission regulations currently allow high school students to earn college
credits which are transferable. Community colleges have a policy on dual enrollment
(Section IV of the Rules of the Senate of the Community Colleges) which
states that high school students need not to have graduated from high school
in order to enroll in community college courses. A high school student who
wishes to dually enroll in community college courses must have completed the
junior year of high school with a “B” average or better, submit ACT scores,
an application form, written recommendations from the high school principal
and guidance counselor, and certification of eligibility. High school
students may not enroll in more than two courses per term unless more courses
are approved by the community college president and documented in the
student’s record. Public universities in Kentucky have institutional policies
regarding dual enrollment rather than state-level policies. |
Student or community college |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Louisiana |
Standard definition |
|
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
More educational options |
The governor of Louisiana has set up a task
force to create state policy for dual enrollment. |
|
Maine |
Standard definition |
|
School district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Few course restrictions |
Program is not limited to gifted and
talented students. Counseling on postsecondary options is provided to
students. |
|
Maryland |
Standard definition |
No information available |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Massachusetts |
Dual enrollment
is defined as a high school student who is enrolled in a postsecondary
institution for both high school and college-level credit. |
The General Laws of Massachusetts Chapter
15A: Section 39, Secondary Education Students Qualified to Enroll in Higher
Education Institutions, allows that qualified high school students
enrolled in public secondary schools may enroll as students in Massachusetts
public postsecondary institutions. Students may enroll either full or for
individual courses. The Board of Education and the Board of Higher Education
shall establish qualification guidelines for this program, establish criteria
for admission, and administer this program. Nonpublic school students are
eligible to participate in the pro-gram with the under-standing that the
crediting of such attendance for a high school diploma shall be the nonpublic
school’s decision to make. Eleventh- and 12th-grade high school students with
at least a “B” average may take courses at any of the public colleges at no
cost. |
Student, or school district or state |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Students do not pay tuition and there are
few course restrictions. Students may enroll in college courses full-time.
All public institutions of higher education allow dual enrollment. Both
public and nonpublic school students can dually enroll. More educational
options are available. |
Students do not pay for books or fees. |
|
Michigan Michigan (continued) |
Standard definition |
|
School district |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary credit
or both secondary and postsecondary credit. |
School districts pay tuition. Students can
enroll in any number of college courses, the only requirement being that the
student be enrolled in both the school district and the postsecondary
institution during the school’s regular academic year and that the student
take at least one high school class. Students may attend any public or private
degree granting higher education institutions in the state. |
Michigan mandates students to receive
postsecondary options counseling. Qualified students must take a state high
school test and be endorsed in the subject area in which they wish to enroll
in order to be eligible to dually enroll.
|
|
Minnesota |
Standard definition |
Enacted in 1985, the Postsecondary
Enrollment Options Program is the oldest dual enrollment program in the
United States. All high school juniors/seniors, except cultural exchange
students, and some adults 21 years of age who do not have a high school
diploma, are eligible to participate under the High School Graduation
Incentives Act. Students may enroll in any public or private postsecondary
institution. The student may only enroll in nonsectarian courses. |
Student or the state |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary credit
or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Students get a head start on college credits
and save money on postsecondary costs as they do no pay tuition. There are
few course restrictions. In general, dual enrollment students do well and
sometimes even better than their college counterparts. |
Dual enrollment participants often have
higher GPAs than regularly admitted postsecondary students. It has been
reported that many AP classes are being dropped due to the impact of dual
enrollment. |
|
Mississippi Mississippi (continued) |
Dual enrollment is
defined as a high school student who is enrolled in a postsecondary
institution while still in high school. |
Statute 37-29-1 Subsection 2 of Supplement,
Vol. 10, authorizes the Boards of Trustees of
community college districts to establish dual enrollment programs for high
school students to take college-level classes. Students must meet the
following conditions in order to enroll in a dual enrollment program: (1) Students
must complete a minimum of 14 core high school units. (2) Students must have
a minimum ACT composite score of 21 or the equivalent SAT score. (3) Students
must have a 3.0 GPA on a 4.0 scale or better. (4) Students must have an
written recommendation from their high school principal and/or guidance
counselor. (5) Students who have not completed the minimum of 14 core high
school units may be considered for the dual enrollment program if they have a
minimum ACT composite score of 30 or the equivalent SAT score, and have the
required GPA and recommendations. High school students can gain early
admission to a college on a full- or part-time basis if they meet the
following criteria: (1) completion of minimum of 14 core high school units,
(2) 3.0 GPA on a 4.0 scale or better; (3) unconditional written
recommendation from high school principal or guidance counselor; (4) minimum
ACT composite score of 26 or the equivalent SAT score; (5) written
recommendation from the principal or guidance counselor that early admission
is in the best educational interest of the student, and that the student’s
age will not keep him/her from being a successful full-time college student. |
School district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
More educational options |
State law allows dual enrollment students to
enroll only in community colleges. |
|
Missouri Missouri (continued) |
Dual enrollment is
defined as a high school student enrolled in a postsecondary institution while
still in high school. |
The Missouri Board of Higher Education has
guidelines for dual enrollment courses taught in high schools by high school
teachers; such courses also may be taught at the community college campus by
college faculty. This policy only affects public institutions and those
private institutions that choose to become signatories to this policy. These
guidelines do not address technically oriented dual credit courses offered by
some colleges. Dual enrollment courses taught by college faculty off-site
from the high school also do not fall under these guidelines. Section
167.223, RSMo (1990), authorizes public high schools in conjunction with
Missouri public community colleges and public or private four-year colleges
and universities to offer postsecondary course options to high school juniors
and seniors. In 1998, Section 167.223, RSMo, was amended to expand
eligibility for dual enrollment courses to 9th- and 10th-grade
high school students. Student dual enrollment eligibility varies according to
the admission standards of the college or university offering the courses in
the high school. All institutions require students to have a minimum overall
GPA of 3.0 on a 4.0 scale or the equivalent, and the student must be
recommended by the high school principal or his or her official designee. |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
In FY 1998, 33 colleges and universities in
Missouri offered dual credit courses.
Approximately 50% of Missouri public high schools provide students
with at least one dual credit opportunity. |
|
Montana |
Standard definition |
No state mandated programs. Dual/concurrent enrollment is on an
institutional basis. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary credit
or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Nebraska |
Standard
definition |
Dual/concurrent enrollment is on an
institutional basis. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
Many dual enrollment courses are taught at
the high school level. |
|
Nevada |
A concurrently enrolled student is a high
school student enrolled in a postsecondary institution for both high school
and college-level credit. |
1995 Code 389.160 states
that a student who successfully completes a postsecondary course must be
permitted to apply that credit towards his/her high school degree (Board
of Regent’s Policy Rev. 183 (06/00), Title 4, Chapter 14, Page 17 Section 21).
The University and Community College System of Nevada concurrent enrollment
policy permits students to register concurrently in courses at the various
institutions subject to the following regulations: (1) Each student is
personally responsible for obtaining the advanced written approval of the
assigned faculty advisor or counselor at the home institution to assure the
course(s) are applicable toward satisfying degree requirements. (2) The
maximum combined concurrent registration load in any one semester is
determined by the advisor and the dean of the college of the student’s home
institution offering the degree or program. (3) Each institution should conduct
periodic post-registration audits to identify any special problems that
should be brought to the attention of the Articulation Board for further
review and study. The Computing Center will support this effort by providing
a report each semester listing the concurrent registrations within the
system. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
New Hampshire |
Standard definition |
No state policy exists. Dual/concurrent enrollment is on an
institutional basis. |
Student or community college |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
Dual enrollment is considered a public
relations tool by universities and colleges, so tuition is often waived. |
|
New Jersey |
Standard definition |
|
State |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Many varied postsecondary institutions offer
dual enrollment options, which provides more educational options for students.
Few course restrictions exist and the cost to students is minimal. Dual
enrollment courses must be accepted on transfer. |
A private out-of-state university is
advertising itself to New Jersey dual enrollment students. |
|
New Mexico |
‘A concurrently enrolled student is a
high school student enrolled in a postsecondary institution for both high
school and college-level credit. |
No state mandated college credit options
programs exist. There are, however, voluntary concurrent enrollment and AP
programs. The concurrent enrollment program allows qualified high school
students to take postsecondary courses for dual credit, usually on college
campuses. Concurrent enrollment agreements between schools and colleges must
be in writing. |
School district or the state |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
More educational options |
No information available |
|
New York |
Standard definition |
Commissioner’s Regulations 52.1(3) state
that enrollment of secondary school students in postsecondary courses shall
be strictly controlled by the postsecondary institution. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
Reimbursement of $100 will be given to the
dual enrollment student who earns an “A” or “B” for the college course; if a
student earns a “C,” he/she will receive a $50 reimbursement. Students who
earn a “D” of “F” will not be reimbursed. |
|
North Carolina North Carolina (continued) |
A concurrently enrolled student is a
high school student enrolled in a postsecondary institution for both high
school and college-level credit |
The Huskins Bill and concurrent enrollment policies
provide opportunities for community colleges and high schools to have
articulated programs, which allow high school students to take courses at a
community college. The Huskins Bill G.S. 115D-20(4) seeks to improve
articulation and to increase student’s college participation rate without
obscuring the distinct roles of high schools and community colleges. Local
administrative boards and local school boards may create cooperative programs
in the their communities to provide for college courses to be offered to
qualified high school students with college credits to be awarded to those
high school students on successful completion of their courses. The bill also
presents nine criteria for how an operating agreement should be established
between the local board of education and the board of trustees of the
community college. Qualified students are defined as students in grades 9-12
who are socially and academically “mature” to handle college credit courses
successfully. The high school and the community college must have a mutual
agreement to define the criteria for student participation. Community colleges are permitted to schedule
college credit courses for high school students, however, qualified high
school students have been permitted to enroll in regularly scheduled college
credit courses for many years through a concurrent enrollment policy of the
State Board of Community Colleges. This policy, as cited in NCAC 2C.0305,
permits high school students to enroll in a community college course
under the following conditions: (1) the student is at least 16 years of age;
(2) the student has been recommended by the chief administrative public
school officer and approved by the president of the community college; (3)
the principal certifies that the student is taking at least three high school
courses and is making appropriate progress toward graduation; (4) enrollment
of high school students cannot displace adult college students. |
State |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
Dual credits transfer but are considered
credits for “elective points” rather than for “quality points.” |
|
North Dakota |
A dually enrolled student is a high
school student enrolled in a postsecondary institution for both high school and
college-level credit. |
Legislation passed in 1996, 28-32-01,
Subdivision q of subsection 1, discusses dual enrollment. Section
403.5 Secondary-Postsecondary Articulation Agreements, Dual Credit
Postsecondary Enrollment Options states that institutions may develop
agreements with secondary schools to offer postsecondary credit. Such
articulation agreements must include a list of eligible secondary courses and
their postsecondary counterparts. They must contain procedures so that
students with eligible secondary coursework may show postsecondary
proficiency and there should be procedures for joint secondary-postsecondary
review of the articulation agreement at regular intervals. Secondary and
postsecondary officials must develop criteria which can be used to evaluate a
student’s proficiency in an articulated course. |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
All institutions in the state’s university
system participate. Participation does not affect state funding to school
districts. In some cases, tuition is discounted when a dual enrollment course
is taught at the high school. |
North Dakota offers dual enrollment through
distance education through the “Interactive Great Western Network.” |
|
Ohio Ohio (continued) |
Dual enrollment
is defined as a high school junior or senior who may earn both high school
and college-level credit. |
Ohio has a Postsecondary Enrollment Options
Program which allows high school juniors and seniors to earn high school and
college credit through dual enrollment. The State Board of Education develops
requirements for participation by schools. Legislation enacted in June 1999
requires students to have earned a minimum 3.0 GPA on a 4.0 scale (or
equivalent) in high school courses in the same subject areas as the college
courses in which they want to enroll through the Postsecondary Enrollment
Options Program. |
School district, community college or the
state |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
There is minimal or no cost to students and few
course restrictions. |
No information available |
|
Oklahoma |
A dually enrolled student is a
12th-grade high school student who may be enrolled in and provisionally
accepted as a special student at a postsecondary institution in the Oklahoma
State System of Higher Education. |
A 12th-grade student can participate in dual
enrollment programs if he/she is enrolled in an accredited high school and
meets all the requirements for dual enrollment. A student may be
provisionally accepted as a special student at a college or university in the
Oklahoma State System of Higher Education. State Regents’ policy also
provides for AP/IB programs and agreements between vocational-technical and
postsecondary institutions. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
More educational options |
Students must receive counseling about
postsecondary enrollment. The policy is very specific about what requirements
students must meet, including SAT/ACT scores, GPA and class rank. |
|
Oregon |
Standard definition |
The 1991 Oregon Administrative Rule
581-043-0510 outlines the community college dual
enrollment policy. Cooperative educational program agreements exist between high
schools and colleges for college credit courses for high school students. |
Student, school district or community
college |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No problem in transferring dual credits
except with private schools. |
No information available |
|
Pennsylvania |
Standard definition |
Dual enrollment is at the institutional
level. |
Student or school district |
|
No information available |
No information available |
|
Rhode Island |
Standard definition |
Dual enrollment is at the institutional
level. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
South Carolina |
Standard definition |
Dual enrollment is governed by state board policy.
The state does provide some funding for AP classes. Many institutions offer
college courses at high schools. The University of South Carolina-Columbia
has an accelerated baccalaureate program. |
Student or school district |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
South Dakota |
Standard definition |
|
Student or school district |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
South Dakota is in the process of
establishing the Digital Dakota System, which is expected to be online by
fall 2001. |
|
Tennessee Tennessee (continued) |
A dually enrolled student is defined as a high
school student in one or more specified college courses for which the student
may earn both high school and college credit. A jointly enrolled student is
defined as a high school student enrolled in one or more college courses for
which the student will earn only college credit. |
Eleventh- and 12th-grade students may enroll
in college classes that meet high school requirements. High school seniors may apply for early
college admission. The Tennessee Board of Regents Non-Degree
Admissions Policy concerning dual enrollment states that high school
students who have completed their sophomore year of high school may be
admitted for either joint enrollment or dual enrollment or both. Talented and
gifted students in grades 9-12, under Chapter 395 of the Public Acts of
1983, may, with the recommendation of their high school principal and
appropriate higher education authorities, enroll in and receive regular
college degree credit from a Tennessee postsecondary institution if such a
student has a minimum GPA of 3.2 on a 4.0 scale and if such a placement is a
part of the student’s planned Individual Education Program. |
Student or school district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Texas |
Standard definition |
|
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
No information available |
|
Utah |
A concurrently enrolled student is
defined as a high school student who is enrolled in a postsecondary
institution while still in high school. |
|
Student, school district, community college
or the state |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Students can accelerate obtainment of a
baccalaureate degree. Cost to students is minimal. The New Century
Scholarship offers strong incentive to concurrently enroll. |
Utah’s New Century Scholarship pays 75% of a
student’s college tuition for a baccalaureate degree at any Utah
state-operated institution of higher learning if he/she earns an associate
degree by September 1st of the same year they qualify to graduate from high
school. Distance learning programs
include EDNET and KULC. Brigham Young University (a private, postsecondary
institution) accepts concurrent enrollment credits. |
|
Virginia Virginia (continued) |
Standard definition |
Since 1988 Virginia has offered formal dual
enrollment programs. The Virginia Plan for Dual Enrollment outlines the program
specifics. Courses must be part of a degree, certificate, or diploma program
at a community college. Courses cannot be developmental, physical education
or health. High school students must be recommended by their schools and meet
community college admissions requirements. High school faculty teaching dual
credit courses must have the same minimum credentials of community college
faculty. The Virginia Plan also includes a section on assessment. |
Student or the school district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Dual enrollment results in time and money
savings. Community colleges and universities benefit from the generation of
FTEs. Dual enrollment improves cooperation and communication between schools
and postsecondary institutions. |
No information available |
|
Vermont |
Standard
definition |
Dual enrollment is on an institutional
basis. Currently Vermont State Colleges, the University of Vermont, and the
Vermont Department of Education are considering the possibility of bringing a
proposed statewide dual enrollment policy to the state legislature. In
addition to serving higher achieving high school students, Vermont is
exploring the possibility of a dual enrollment model that will create
alternative college learning opportunities for “at risk” students. |
Student |
Only secondary credit, only postsecondary
credit or both secondary and postsecondary credit |
No information available |
The state is looking at developing a statewide
dual enrollment policy than not only allows high achieving students to take
college courses, but also one that gives alternative college learning
opportunities to “at-risk” students. |
|
Washington |
A dually enrolled student is a high
school student who is enrolled in a postsecondary institution. A concurrently
enrolled student is enrolled at two or more community colleges at the
same time. |
|
School district |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
The Running Start Program offers minimal
costs to students as well as challenging classes and flexibility of courses.
The program has been well received by parents and students alike. |
No information available |
|
Wisconsin |
Standard definition |
|
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
Cost to students is minimal and dual enrollment
provides more educational options. |
No information available |
|
West Virginia |
Standard definition |
Dual enrollment is on an institutional
basis. |
Student, community college or the state |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
There are no problems in transferring dual
credits. |
No information available |
|
Wyoming |
Standard definition |
Wyoming State Statute 21-20-201, Article 2,
Wyoming Postsecondary Education Options Program gives
guidelines for agreements between school districts and postsecondary
institutions, student participation, credits, financial arrangements and
transportation. |
Student |
Both secondary and postsecondary credit |
There are no problems in transferring dual enrollment
credits. |
There are no incentives for the dual
enrollment program to grow because of the standards at the high school level. |
Compiled by
Genevieve Hale, ECS Center for Community College Policy.
|
© Copyright 2002 by the Education Commission
of the States (ECS). All rights reserved. The Education Commission of the States is a
nonprofit, nationwide organization that helps state leaders shape education
policy. It is ECS policy to take affirmative action to prevent discrimination
in its policies, programs and employment practices. To request permission to excerpt part of
this publication, either in print or electronically, please fax a request to
the attention of the ECS Communications Department, 303.296.8332 or e-mail ecs@ecs.org. |
Used with
Permission: “Dear
Shelly, Permission is granted
to excerpt the graph from the Education Commission of the States (ECS)
StateNote on Enrollment, "Postsecondary Options: Dual/Concurrent
Enrollment," for use in your appendix for your paper.” Email, April 29,
2004.
Appendix C
Complete
listing of distance learning courses reported by the colleges/universities
responding to the questionnaire (see page 22):
Institution
1:
CHEM
101, 102, 103 General Chemistry
CHEM
470 Natural Products
ENGL
434 Advanced Engineering
Syntax
PEAC
101A Jogging
HLED
162 Fitness for Life
HLED
166 Health and Education
MGT
477 Electronic Commerce
INFS
144 PC Operating
Systems
INFS
148 PC Spreadsheets
INFS
149 PC Databases
MATH 019 Intro to Algebra
MATH
096 Intermediate Algebra
MATH
222 Intro. To Statistics
NURS
375 Transcultural Nursing
NURS
375 End of life Issues
BIOL
345 Environmental
Science
BIOL
111, 112, 113 Biological Foundation
Institution
2:
Themes
in Literature
Broadcast
Newswriting
Selected
grad. Courses
General
Sociology
Methods
of teaching Bible
Institution
3:
Physical
science
Astronomy
Denominations
in America
Institution
4:
See
ADEC course listing @ www.adventistedu.org
(course listing for this institution was not current on the web site; no
courses were found)
Institution
5:
Core
curriculum for medical residents
Institution
6:
Most all in our
bulletin except nursing and social work
Institution
7:
We are
affiliated with HIS/Griggs University, so all courses available through our
External Degree affiliation w/HIS are (college/university) transcripted
courses.
Institution
8:
Physical
science
Astronomy
Denominations
in America
Institution
9:
Social Work
Theory
Religion in
Elem School
Religion in
Secondary School
School
Leadership
Broadcast
Newswriting
Gen Sociology
Appendix
D
Compiled AP Course List (see page 29):
|
1 |
Advanced Computer
Application |
|
2 |
Anatomy and
Physiology |
|
4 |
Biology |
|
1 |
Biology II |
|
11 |
Calculus
(online course at one school due to low enrollment) |
|
2 |
Chemistry |
|
1 |
Chemistry |
|
9 |
English |
|
2 |
English
Composition 101 & 102 (one taught by visiting college professors) |
|
3 |
English IV
(Literature) |
|
5 |
English
Language and composition |
|
5 |
English
Literature and composition |
|
1 |
Environmental
Science |
|
2 |
General
Psychology |
|
1 |
Java
Programming |
|
1 |
Listening to
Music |
|
2 |
Physics |
|
4 |
Politics/American
Government |
|
1 |
Pre Calculus
|
|
3 |
Spanish |
|
1 |
Spanish III |
|
1 |
US History
(next year) |
|
7 |
US/American
History |
|
1 |
World
History |
Process for Conferring Credit
Compiled comments: “What is your process for conferring credit for advanced placement
classes?”
§
The grade that
is given for comp 101 & 102 is also given to seniors for their English IV
credit.
§
If students pass
the AP exam with a 3 or better, they receive the additional GPA point for the
class.
§
We grant high
school credit for successful completion. AP scores are sent on to selected
college for credit approval for each student scoring well enough on test.
§
Students
receive high school credit as they would for any class taken.
§
These classes
have a GPA multiplication factor of 1.25 to enhance the GPA since they are more
challenging.
§
Pass the class
and pass the AP exam.
§
Regular credit
plus college credit where applicable.
§
Honors credit
until verification that they passed the test.
§
They are
awarded regular/standard semester periods.
§
Same as
“regular” courses.
§
No special
process.
§
Students
enrolled in the AP class receive AP credit.
§
Their grades are
on a 5.0 scale. If they get les than a B they get regular credit and class
level.
§
Grade achieved
in the class since the class is taken in place of the regular 12th
grade English Lit.
§
It receives
the same credit (1 unit) as other English classes.
§
Pass AP test –
they receive AP credit/ do not pass then high school credit.
§
The student
receives credit from Sunnydale Academy and the college we work through to give
this class. (They have 2 transcripts.)
§
PUC gives our
teacher permission to teach class.
§
Completion of
the course – weighted GPA credit given as follows: A = 5 pts. B = 4 pts.
§
We do the 4
scale – no accelerated GPA’s
§
A = 5.0, B =
4.0, C = 3.0, D = 1.0, F = 0.0
§
Dual credit
through SAU
§
Student must
pass with a C or better. All are required to take the AP test at the end of the
school year.
§
We teach the
class as a regular AP level class, give grades as any other class, and
administer the AP test in May. College credit is given by colleges based on
test score alone. Classroom grade has nothing to do with college credit.
§
Class received
10 units of credit on 5.0 scale.
§
GPA
requirement; prerequisite requirements; Advanced Placement GPA based on 5.0
scale.
§
If they take
the class and don’t take AP test, an A = 4.5. If they take the AP test and pass
with a 3, 4, or 5, an A = 5.0.
Appendix E
Surveys for
colleges, academies, and church clerks
College VP Questionnaire
Questionnaire
To be filled out by college/university academic vice president or person that he/she delegates
1. Does your institution currently offer any advanced placement classes for high school students?
_____ yes – Go on to 1a-e
_____ no – Go on to 2
1a. Please give additional information about advanced placement classes offered to high school students.
What are the eligibility requirements for enrollment in advanced placement classes?
____GPA requirements
What is the minimum GPA: ____
____Age requirements
What is the minimum age: ____
____Seniors only
____ Juniors and seniors
____ Other (Please detail:
1b. What kinds of advanced placement classes do you offer to high school students?
____ Classes taught by on-site faculty at your institution (high school students must be on the college/university campus to participate)
____ Classes taught by college professors visiting academy campuses
____ Other (Please detail:
1c. What advanced placement classes do you currently offer?
1d. What is your process for accepting credit for advanced placement classes from academies?
1e. If visiting college professors teach some advanced placement classes at some academies, how is reimbursement for these classes handled?
2. Have you considered offering advanced placement classes for academy junior or junior and senior students?
____ yes
____ no
3. Have you offered advanced placement classes in the past?
____ yes
____ no
4. Are you aware of any dual enrollment/dual credit programs in your state that offer high school credit for college courses?
____ yes
____ no
5. Does your institution accept any credits from public dual enrollment/dual credit programs?
____ yes
____ no
6. Does your institution offer any distance education classes?
____ yes (if yes, please list all distance education classes)

____ no
7. Does your institution offer general education college classes to high school juniors and/or seniors?
____ yes (if yes, please list all classes available to high school juniors and/or seniors)

____ no
8. What benefits do you see in offering general education classes through distance education (online learning)?
9. What drawbacks do you see for offering general education classes through distance education (online learning)?
10. What support does your institution give you for the development of distance education courses?
Please send completed
questionnaire to:
Shelley Bacon
556 Hotchkiss Road
Colville, WA 99114
509-684-1005
Academy Registrar
Survey
Questionnaire
To be filled out by academy registrars
2. Does your academy currently offer any advanced placement classes for high school students?
_____ yes – Go on to 1a-e
_____ no – Go on to 2
1a. Please give additional information about advanced placement classes offered to high school students.
What are the eligibility requirements for enrollment in advanced placement classes?
____GPA requirements
What is the minimum GPA: ____
____Age requirements
What is the minimum age: ____
____Seniors only
____ Juniors and seniors
____ Other (Please detail:
1b. What kinds of advanced placement classes do you offer to high school students?
____ Classes taught by on-site faculty
____ Classes taught by visiting college professors
____ Other (Please detail:
1c. What advanced placement classes do you currently offer?
1d. What is your process for conferring credit for advanced placement classes?
1e. If visiting college professors teach some advanced placement classes at your school, how is reimbursement for these classes handled?
8. Have you considered offering advanced placement classes for your junior or junior and senior students?
____ yes
____ no
9. Have you offered advanced placement classes in the past?
____ yes
____ no
10. Are you aware of any dual enrollment/dual credit programs in your state that offer high school credit for college courses?
____ yes
____ no
Please send completed
questionnaire to:
Shelley Bacon
556 Hotchkiss Road
Colville, WA 99114
509-684-1005
Church name and location: ______________ Membership: ___
To be filled out by Church Clerk or Educational Secretary (or person of his/her choosing familiar with the youth of the church)
For the purpose of research about implementing a faith-based, distinctly Seventh-day Adventist educational program to meet the needs of Adventist high school students, please fill out the following questionnaire and table to the best of your knowledge. If you have more than 40 high school aged students in your congregation, please make a copy of these pages and write “section 2” on the upper right hand corner of each additional page. If you would like to complete this survey in a digital format, please email me at bacon.home@juno.com.
Total number of ALL students in your church:
In grades K-8 _______
In grades 9-12 ________
In college: ________
Track each student you can, beginning with their freshman year of high school and continuing through their first year of college. Follow the example in the chart labeled “Sample Table.”
Please send completed
questionnaire to:
Shelley Bacon
556 Hotchkiss Road
Colville, WA 99114
509-684-1005
|
|
Home School |
Public School |
Local 10 or 12
grade day academy |
Boarding
Academy |
Community
College (Dual enrollment program) |
Other (Christian schools,
distance education, etc.) |
Community
College (Regular
enrollment) |
Adventist
College |
|
Student 1 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
||
|
Student 2 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
|
Student 3 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 4 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 5 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 6 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 7 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 8 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 9 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 10 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 11 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |
|
Student 12 |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Junior Senior |
Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior |
Freshman in college |
Freshman in college |